Investigating Entrepreneurial Orientation and Firm Performance in the Iranian Agricultural Context

Authors
1 Department of Agricultural Extension and Education, Faculty of Agricultural Economics and Extension, University of Tehran, Tehran, Islamic Republic of Iran.
2 Department of Agricultural Economics, Faculty of Agriculture, University of Kurdistan, Sanandaj, Islamic Republic of Iran.
Abstract
An explanatory survey was carried out in 2008 to investigate the relationship between Entrepreneurial Orientation (EO), environmental factors, human capital and organizational characteristics vs. entrepreneurial performance among entrepreneurial firms in Iranian agricultural sector. Data were obtained from a sample of 120 Iranian agricultural establishments, using an interview-oriented questionnaire. The hierarchical regression analysis revealed that: although there is a positive direct relationship between EO and entrepreneurial performance in an agricultural business setting, applying main-effect or contingency models only, provides a distracting picture of entrepreneurial performance in agricultural settings. It was also found that configurational approach may better explain the relationship between EO, environmental factors, human capital and organizational characteristics vs. entrepreneurial performance over and above contingency and above main- effect models.

Keywords


1. Ahmadpour-e-Dariani, M. 2000. A Model to Educate Entrepreneur Managers for Iranian Industry. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Iran.
2. Becherer, R. C. and Maurer, J. G. 1997. The Moderating Effect of Environmental Variables on the Entrepreneurial and Marketing Orientation of Entrepreneurial-led Firms. Entrep. Theory Pract., 22: 47-58.
3. Cohen, J. and Cohen, P. 1983. Applied Multiple Regression/Correlation Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. 2nd Edition, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, PP. 703.
4. Covin, J. G., Green K. M. and Slevin, D. P. 2006. Strategic Process Effects on the Entrepreneurial Orientation–sales Growth Rate Relationship. Entrep. Theory Pract. 30(1): 57–81.
5. Dess, G. G., Lumpkin, G. T. and Covin, J. G. 1997. Entrepreneurial Strategy Making and Firm Performance: Tests of Contingency and Configurational Models. Strategic Management Journal, 18(9): 677–695.
6. Eskandari, F. 2006. Strategies to Integrate Entrepreneurship Education into the Iranian Higher Agricultural Education System. Unpublished PhD. Dissertation, University of Tehran, Iran.
7. Feifei, Y. 2012. Strategic Flexibility, Entrepreneurial Orientation and Firm Performance: Evidence from Small and Medium-sized Business (SMB) in China. Afr. J. Bus. Manag., 6(4):1711-1720.
8. Hau-siu Chow, I. 2006. The Relationship between Entrepreneurial Orientation and Firm Performance in China. Advanced Management Journal, 71(3): 11-20.
9. Hitt, M., Bierman, L., Shimizu, K. and Kochhar, R. 2001. Direct and Moderating Effect of Human Capital on Strategy and Performance in Professional Service Firms: A Resource-based Perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 44: 13-28.
10. Kraus, S.; Rigtering, J. P. C.; Hughes, M.; and Hosman, V. 2012. Entrepreneurial Orientation and the Business Performance of SMEs: A Quantitative Study from the Netherlands. Rev. managerial sci., 6 (2), 161-182.
11. Lumpkin, G. T. and Dess, G. G. 1996. Clarifying the Entrepreneurial Orientation Construct and Linking it to Performance. Academy of Management, 21(1): 135-160.
12. Lumpkin, G. T. and Dess, G. G. 2001. Linking Two Dimensions of Entrepreneurial Orientation to Firm Performance: The Moderating Role of Environment and Industry Life Cycle. Journal of Business Venturing, 16(5): 429-451.
13. Madsen, E. L. 2007. The Significance of Sustained Entrepreneurial Orientation on Performance of Firms: A Longitudinal Analysis. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development 19: 185–204.
14. Miller, D. 1983. The Correlates of Entrepreneurship in Three Types of Firms. Management Science, 29: 770-791.
15. Paige, R. C. 1999. Craft retail Entrepreneurs’ Perceptions of Success and Factors Effecting Success. ProQuest Digital Dissertations (UMI No. 9950110).
16. Petrin, T. 1997. Entrepreneurship as an Economic Force in Rural Development. In: "Rural Development through Entrepreneurship", (Eds.): Petrin, T. and Gannon, A.. FAO, Rome, Italy, PP. 203.
17. Petrin, T., 1994. Entrepreneurship as an Economic Force in Rural Development. In: Rural Development through Entrepreneurship, Compiled and Edited by Tea Petrin & Agnes Gannon, FAO, Rome, Italy, pp. 203.
18. Rauch, A., Wiklund, J., Lumpkin, G. T. and Frese, M. 2009. Entrepreneurial Orientation and Business Performance: An Assessment of Past Research and Suggestions for the Future, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice 33(3): 761–778.
19. Soininen, J., Martikainen, M., Puumalainen, K. and Kyläheiko, K. 2011. Entrepreneurial Orientation: Growth and Profitability of Finnish Small- and Medium-sized Enterprises. International Journal of Production Economics. doi:10.1016/j.ijpe.2011.05.029
20. Wiklund, J. and Shepherd, D. 2005. Entrepreneurial Orientation and Small Business Performance: A Configurational Approach, Journal of Business Venturing, 20: 71–91.
21. Wiklund, J. 1999. The Sustainability of the Entrepreneurial Orientation–performance Relationship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 24(1): 37–48.
22. Li, Y. H., Huang, J. W., Tsai, M. T. 2009. Entrepreneurial Orientation and Firm Performance: The Role of Knowledge Creation Process. Ind. Mark. Man., 38 (4): 440-449.
23. Zahra, S. 1993a. A Conceptual Model of Entrepreneurship as Firm Behavior: A Critique and Extension. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 16: 5–21.
24. Zahra, S. A. and Covin, J. G. 1995. Contextual Influences on the Corporate Entrepreneurship-performance Relationship: A Longitudinal Analysis. Journal of Business Venturing, 10(1): 43-58.
25. Zahra, S. A. 1993b. Environment, Corporate Entrepreneurship, and Financial Performance: A Taxonomic Approach. Journal of Business Venturing, 8: 319–340.