Structural Analysis of Factors Affecting Agricultural Sustainability in Qazvin Province, Iran

Authors
A. Asadi
K. Kalantari
S. Choobchian
S. Choobchian
Faculty of Agricultural Economics and Development, University College of Agricultural and Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj, Islamic Republic of Iran.
Abstract
Agricultural sustainability refers to the ability of a farm to produce food indefinitely, without causing irreversible damage to ecosystem health. The main objective of this study was to formulate a structural model to analyze the effects of ecological, social, and economic factors on sustainable agricultural development in Qazvin Province of Iran. To achieve this aim, a structural model with 4 latent variables and 14 observed indicators was used. Required data were collected by questionnaire from 220 wheat cropping farmers who were selected through a stratified sampling design from four counties located in Qazvin Province. Linear structural relationships were used to calculate the impact of various factors on sustainability of agriculture. The computer software of LISREL was used to specify, fit, and evaluate structural equation model. The result of the analysis showed that ecological, social, and economic sustainability positively affected the agricultural sustainability, but, ecological sustainability had a greater impact on agricultural sustainability (0.642) than economic (0.604) and social (0.568) sustainability. The model gives right signals on what has been happening to agricultural development in Iran. The result of this study can also assist agricultural planners and policy-makers in identifying appropriate policies and in monitoring the effectiveness of policy interventions.

Keywords

1. Alavi Panah, S. K., Goossens, R., Matinfar, H. R., Mohamad, H. Ghaderi, M., Irannegad, H. and Alikhah Asl, M. 2008. The Efficiency of Landsat TM and ETM+ Thermal Data for Extracting Soil Information in Arid Regions. J. Agric. Sci. Technol., 10: 439-460.
2. Browne, M. W. and Cudeck, R. 1993. Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit, In: "Testing Structural Equation Models", (Eds.): Bollen, K. A. and Long, J. S.. Newbury Park, Sage, CA, PP. 445-455.
3. Brugmann, J.1997. Is There a Method in Our Measurement? The Use of Indicators in Local Sustainable Development Planning. Local Environ., 20(1): 59–72.
4. Bumb, B. and Baanante, C. 2004. The Role of Fertilizer in Sustaining Food Security and Protecting the Environment to 2020. 2020 Vision Discussion Paper 17, IFPRI, Washington, DC.
5. Cassman, K. G, Datta, S. K. De, Olk, D. C., Alcantara, J., Samson, M., Descalsota, J. and Dizon, M. 2005. Yield Decline and the Nitrogen Economy of Long Term Experiments on Continuous, Irrigated Rice Systems in the Tropics. In: "Soil Management: Experimental Basis for Sustainability and Environmental Quality", (Ed.): Lal, R. and Stewart, B.. CRC Press, Boca Raton, Fla. USA, PP.64-75.
6. Darvishi, A. K. 2003. Capacity and Ability of Sustainable Development in Iran. Iranian J. Agric. Eco. Dev., 5(2): 30-53.
7. Diamantopoulos, A. and Siguaus, J. 2000. Introducing LISREL. SAGE Publications, London, PP.26-38.
8. Dregne, H. E. 2002. Erosion and Soil Productivity in Africa. Journal of Soil and Water Conserv., 45: 431-436.
9. Farrell, A. and Hart, M. 1998. What Does Sustainability Really Mean? The Search for Useful Indicators. Environ., 40(9): 5–31.
10. Gahinl, A. 1998. The Search for Useful Indicators: Attempts to Measure Agricultural Sustainability. Environ., 38(8): 15–31.
11. Goldberger, A. S. and Duncan, O. D.1973. Structural Equation Models in the Social Sciences. Seminar Press, New York, PP.54-66.
12. Hardin, G. 1998. The Tragedy of the Commons. Sci., 162(1243): 1243–1248.
13. Jepson, E. J. 2001 Sustainability and Planning: Diverse Concepts and Close Associations. J. Plann. Liter., 15(4): 499–510.
14. Joreskog, K. G. and Sorbom, D. 2004. LISREL 8.7. Scientific Software, International Inc., Chicago.
15. Kalantari, Kh. 2009. Structural Equation Modeling in Socio-economic Research (with LISREL and SIMPLIS Software). Farhang Saba Publication, Tehran, PP.86-98
16. Karami, E. and Rezaei-Moghaddam, K.1998. Poverty and Sustainable Agriculture: A Qualitative Analysis. Iranian Quarterly J. Rural Dev. Studies, 2(3): 1-29.
17. Karbasioun, M., Mulder, M. and Biemans, H.2008 Changes and Problems of Agricultural Development in Iran. World J. Agric. Sci., 4(6): 759-769.
18. Meadows, D. H.1994. The Limits to Growth: A Report for the Club of Rome’s Project on the Predicament of Mankind. 2nd Edition, Universe, New York, PP.33-42.
19. Michalos, A. C.1997. Combining Social, Economic and Environmental Indicators to Measure Sustainable Human Well-being. Soc. Indicators Res., 40(1–2): 221–258
20. Organization for Economic Co-Operation and Development. 1998. Towards Sustainable Development: Environmental Indicators. SAGE publication, Paris, PP.14-22.
21. Roseland, M.1998. Toward Sustainable Communities: Resources for Citizens and Their Governments. Revised Edition, ISBN: 10: 086571374X, New Society Publishers, Gabriola Island, 256 PP.
22. Schlossberg, M., and Zimmerman, A.2007. Developing Statewide Indices of Environmental, Economic, and Social Sustainability: A Look at Oregon and the Oregon Benchmarks. Local Environ., 8(6): 641–660.
23. Steenkamp, J. and Trijp, H.1999. The Use of LISREL in Validating Marketing Constructs. Inter. J. Res. Marketing, 8(4): 283-299.
24. Vaezi, A. R., Bahrami, H. A., Sadeghi, S. H. R. and Mahdian, M. H. 2010. Spatial Variability of Soil Erodibility Factor (K) of the USLE in North West of Iran. Agric. Sci. Technol., 10: 439-460.
25. World Commission on Environment and Development.1987. Our Common Future. Oxford University Press, Oxford, PP.62-71.
Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology
Volume 15, Issue 1
January and February 2013
Pages 11-22