Biochemical and Physiological Responses of Two Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Cultivars to Drought Stress Applied at Seedling Stage

Authors
M. Valifard 1
A. Moradshahi 1
B. Kholdebarin 2
1 Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Islamic republic of Iran.
2 Department of Biology, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Fars, Islamic Republic of Iran.
Abstract
Zagros (drought tolerant) and Pishtaz (drought susceptible) cultivars were classified on the basis of shoot dry weight and were used as plant material in this study. Total chlorophyll, carotenoids, antocyanins, proline, soluble sugar contents, lipid peroxidation, antioxidant enzyme activities and protein patterns were determined. Seedlings of wheat genotypes were grown in nutrient solution cultures under 16 h d-1 period at room temperature. With the decrease in osmotic potential, total chlorophyll initially increased but then decreased in the tolerant cultivar. The amount of total carotenoids and antocyanins in both cultivars increased in response to drought stress. However, the increase was only significant (P< 0.05) at some osmotic potentials. The increase was more pronounced in the tolerant cultivar. Soluble sugars and proline increased significantly in both cultivars, but were higher in the tolerant one. The sensitive cultivar showed higher rates of lipid peroxidation as compared to the tolerant cultivar. Antioxidant enzymes activities increased with the decrease in osmotic potential in both cultivars. The tolerant cultivar exhibited a higher antioxidant activity compared to the sensitive one. SDS-PAGE showed new protein bands under water stress. These results indicated that proline, soluble sugars contents and antioxidant enzyme activities are part of the defense mechanisms which confer water deficit tolerance to wheat cultivars. APX= Ascorbate peroxidase; CAT= Catalase; GR= Glutathione reductase; MDA= Malondialdehyde; ROS= Reactive oxygen species, SOD= Superoxide dismutase.

Keywords

1. Aebi, H. 1984. Catalase In vitro. Methods Enzymol., 105:121-126.
2. Anjum, A. H., Xie, X. Y., Wang, L. C., Saleem, M. F., Man, C. and Le, W. 2011. Morphological, Physiological and Biochemical Responses of Plants to Drought Stress. Afri. J. Agri. Re., 6(9): 2026-2032.
3. Arnon, D. I., Allen, M. B., and Whatley, F. R. 1956. Photosynthesis by Isolated Chloroplast. IV. General Concept and Comparison of Three Photochemical Reactions. Biochim. Biophys. Acta., 20: 449-461.
4. Bates, L. S. 1973. Rapid Determination of Free Proline for Water Stress Studies. Plant Soil, 39: 205-207.
5. Blokhina, O., Virolainen, E. and Fagerstedt, K. 2003. Antioxidants, Oxidative Damage and Oxygen Deprivation Stress: A Review. Ann. Bot., 91: 179-194.
6. Dalmia, A. and Sawhney, V. 2004. Antioxidant Defense Mechanism under Drought Stress in Wheat Seedling. Physiol. Mol. Biol. Plant., 10: 109-114.
7. Fazeli, F., Niknam, V. and Ghorbanli, M. 2005. Effect of Drought on Biomass, Protein Content, Lipid Peroxidation and Antioxidant Enzymes in Two Sesame Cultivars. Biol. Plant., 51: 98-103.
8. Gimenez, C. Mitchell, V. J. and Lawlor, D. W. 1992. Regulation of Photosynthesis Rate of Two Sunflowers Hybrids under Water Stress. Plant. Physiol., 98: 516–524.
9. Heath, R. and Packer, L. 1968. Photoperoxidation in Isolated Chloroplast. I. Kinetics and Stoichiometry of Fatty Acid Peroxidation. Arch. Biochem. Biophs., 125: 189-190.
10. Hoagland, D. R. and Arnon, D. I. 1950. The Water Culture Method for Growing Plants without Soil. Circular 347, Agriculture Experiments Solution, California, p.31.
11. Howltt, A. C. and Pogson, B. J. 2006. Carotenoid Accumulation and Function in Seeds and Non-Green Tissues. Plant Cell Environ., 29: 435-445.
12. Hughes, A. C. and Pogson, B. J. 2007. Attenuation of Incident Light in Galax urceolata (Diapensiaceae): Concerted Influence of Adaxial and Abaxialanthocyanic Layers on Photoprotection. Amer. J. Bot., 98: 784-790.
13. Ismail, T., Melike, B., Filiz, O. and Hulusi, K. 2005. Differential Responses of Lipid Peroxidation and Antioxidants in the Leaves of Drought-tolerant P. acutifolius Gray and Drought-sensitive P. vulgaris L. Subjected to Polyethylene Glycol Mediated Water Stress. Plant. Sci., 168: 223-231.
14. Laemmli, U. K. 1970. Cleavage of Structural Protein during the Assembly of the Head of Bacteriophage T4. Nature, 227: 685-690.
15. Li, T. H. and Li, S. H. 2005. Leaf responses of Micropropagated Apple Plants to Water Stress: Nonstructural Carbohydrate Composition and Regulatory Role of Metabolic Enzymes. Tree Physiol., 25: 495-504.
16. Lichtenthaler, H. K. 1987. Chlorophylls and Carotenoids: Pigments of Photosynthetic Biomembranes. Methods. Enzymol., 148: 350-382.
17. Lobato, A. K. S., Santos, B. G., Costa, R. C. L., Oliveira, C. F., Meirelles, A. C. S., Cruz, F. J. R., Alves, G. A. R., Neves, H. K. B., Pita, J. D., Lopes, M. J. S., Freitas, J. M. N., Monteiro, B. S. and Ferreira, R. R. 2008. Physiological and Biochemical Changes in Soybean (Glycine max) Plants under Progressive Water Deficit during the Vegetative Phase. Agric. J. 3: 327-333.
18. Mac-Adam, J. W., Nelson, C. J. and Sharp, R. E. 1992. Peroxidase Activity in the Leaf Elongation Zone of Tall Fescue: I. Spatial Distribution of Ionically Bound Peroxidase Activity in Genotypes Differing in Length of the Elongation Zone. Plant. Physiol., 99: 872-878.
19. Merzlyak, N. M., Chivkunova, O. B., Sobvchenko A. E. and Naqvikr, K. R. 2008. Light Absorption by Anthocyanins in Juvenile, Stressed, and Senescing Leaves. J. Exp. Bot., 59: 3903-3911.
20. Michel, B. E. and Kaufmann, M. R. 1973. The Osmotic Potential of Polyethylene Glycol 6000. Plant. Physiol., 51: 914-916.
21. Mohammadkhani, N. and Heidari, R. 2008. Drought-induced Accumulation of Soluble Sugars and Proline in Two Maize Varieties. World Appl. Sci. J., 3: 448-453.
22. Nanjo, T., Kobayashi, M., Yoshiba, Y., Sanada, Y., Wada, K., Tsukaya, H., Kakubari, Y., Yamaguchi-shinozaki, K. and Shinozaki, K. 1999. Biological Functions of Proline in Morphogenesis and Osmotolerance Revealed in Antisense Transgenic Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant. J., 18: 185-193.
23. Nelson, N. 1944. A photometric Adaptation of the Somogyi Method for the Determination of Glucose. Biol. Chem., 153: 375-380.
24. PasbanEslam, B. 2011. Evaluation of Physiological Indices for Improving Water Deficit Tolerance in Spring Safflower. Agr. Sci. Tech., 13: 327-338.
25. Rampino, P., Pataleo, S., Gerardi, C., Mita, G. and Perrotta, C. 2006. Drought Stress Response in Wheat: Physiological and Molecular Analysis of Resistant and Sensitive Genotypes. Plant Cell Environ., 29: 2143-2152.
26. Sanker, B., Jaleel, C.A., Manivannan, P., Kishorekumar, A., Somasundarum, R. and Panneerselvam, R. 2007. Drought-induced Biochemical Modifications and Proline Metabolism in Abelmoschus esculentus (L.) Moench. Acta. Bot. Croat., 66: 43-56.
27. Spyropuolos, C. G. and Mavrommatis, M. 2005. Effect of Water Stress on Pigment Formation in Quercus Species. J. Exp. Bot., 29: 473-477.
28. Tas, S. and Tas, B. 2007. Some Physiological Responses of Drought Stress in Wheat Genotypes with Different Ploidy in Turkye. World. J. Agric. Sci., 3: 178-183.
29. Wanger, G.J. 1979. Content and Vacuole/Extra Vacuole Distribution of Neutral Sugars, Free Amino Acids and Anthocyanins in Protoplasts. Plant. Physiol., 64: 88-93.
30. Yang, F., Xu, X., Xiao, X. and Li, C. 2009. Responses to Drought Stress in Two Poplar Species Originating from Different Altitudes. Biol. Plant., 53: 511-516.
31. Zulkarnain, W. M., Ismail, M. R., Ashrafuzzaman, M., Saud, H. M. and Haroun, I. C. 2009. Growth, Physiological and Bbiochemical Responses of Malaysia Rice Cultivars to Water Stress. 32(2): 323 – 333.
Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology
Volume 14, Issue 7
November and December 2012
Pages 1567-1578