Relationships between Some Soil Quality Indicators in Different Agricultural Soils from Varamin, Iran

Authors
H. Emami 1
M. R. Neyshabouri 2
M. Shorafa 3
1 Author (Asistant Professor)
2 Professor
3 Asistant professor
Abstract
Soil quality is a necessary indicator of land management. Different indices are applied to evaluate farming systems, soil types and land uses based on soil quality. The slope of retention curve at its inflection point has been defined as soil physical quality index (Si) but the relationships between Si and penetration resistance (PR), the least limiting water range (LLWR), and available water content (AWC) have not been studied yet. In this study, I) the effects of soil physical properties on Si index and PR, and II) the relationships between Si index and PR, LLWR, and AWC were investigated. Seventy undisturbed soil samples were collected and the slope at inflection point for soil retention curve as a soil physical quality index (Si) was determined in each sample using soil retention curve data. Furthermore, PR was measured in soil surface, and LLWR and AWC were calculated. The results showed that the correlations between PR and water content, Electrical conductivity (ECe), SAR, and Si index were significant at P<0.01, whereas its correlations with bulk density (ρb), and organic matter (OM) were significant at P<0.05. There was also a negative correlation found between AWC and PR (P<0.01). In addition, a positive correlation between Si and LLWR, and a negative correlation between PR and LLWR among soil samples (P<0.01) were found to exist. Therefore, the Si index provides a tool that can be used to compare different soils or the effects of different management practices on soil physical properties.

Keywords

1. Arshad, M.A. and Coen, G.M. 1992. Characterization of soil quality: Physical and chemical criteria. Am. J. Altern. Agric. 7: 25–31.
2. Ayers, P.D. and Perumpral, J.V. 1982. Moisture and density effect on cone index. Trans. ASAE. 24: 1169–1172.
3. Betz, C.L., Allmaras, R.R., Copeland, S.M. and Randall, G.W. 1998. Least limiting water range: traffic and long-term tillage influences in a Webster soil. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 62: 1384– 1393.
4. Blake, G.R. and Hartge, K.H.1986. Bulk density. In: Klute, A., (Ed.), Methods of soil analysis. Part1-Physical and mineralogical methods. Seconds edition. Agronomy No.9. America Society of Agronomy, Inc. Soil Science Society of America, Madison, Wisconsin. USA.
5. Chan, K.Y. 1995. Strength characteristics of a potentially hardsetting soil under pasture and conventional tillage in the semi-arid region of Australia. Soil Till. Res. 34: 105-113.
6. DA Silva, A.P., Kay, B.D. and Perfect, E. 1994. Characterization of the least limiting water range of soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 58: 1775– 1781.
7. Dexter, A.R. 2004. Soil physical quality. Part I: Theory, effects of soil texture, density, and organic matter, and effects on root growth. Geoderma, 120: 201-214.
8. Dexter, A.R. and Chan, K.Y., 1991. Soil mechanical properties as influenced by exchangeable cations. J. Soil Sci. 42: 219-226.
9. Elliott, E.T. 1994. The potential use of soil biotic activity as an indicator of productivity, sustainability and pollution. In: Pankhurst, C.E., Doube, B.M., Gupta, V.V.S.R., Grace, P.R., (Eds.), Soil Biota: Management in Sustainable Farming Systems. CSIRO, Melbourne, pp. 250–256.
10. Emami, H., Shorafa, M., Neyshaboori, M.R., and Liaghat, A.M. 2008. Prediction of Soil physical quality index by using of conveniently measurable soil properties in some saline and calcareous soils. Iranian J Soil water Res. 39(1): 39-46.
11. Faure, A.G. and Da Mata, J.D.V. 1994. Penetration resistance value among compaction curves. J. Geotech. Eng. 120(1): 46-59.
12. Franzmeier, D.P., Chartres, C.J. and Wood, J.T. 1996. Hardsetting soils in southeast Australia: landscape and profile processes. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 60: 1178– 1187.
13. Gee, G.W. and Bauder, J.W. 1986. Particle–size analysis. In: Klute, A., (Ed.), Methods of soil analysis. Part1-Physical and mineralogical methods. Seconds edition. Agronomy No.9. America Society of Agronomy, Inc. Soil Science Society of America, Madison, Wisconsin. USA.
14. Groenevelt, P.H., Grant, C.D. and Semesta, S. 2001. A new procedure to determine water availability. Aust. J. Soil Res. 39: 577–598.
15. Karlen, D.L., Andrews, S.S., and Doran, J.W. 2001. In: Sparks, D.L. (Ed.), Soil Quality: Current Concepts and Applications. Advances in Agronomy, Academic Press, San Diego, California, pp. 1–40.
16. Klute, A. 1986. Water retention: laboratory methods. In: Klute, A., (Ed.), Methods of soil analysis. Part1-Physical and mineralogical methods. Seconds edition. Agronomy No.9. America Society of Agronomy, Inc. Soil Science Society of America, Madison, Wisconsin. USA.
17. Lowery, B. and Schular, R.T.1994. Duration and effects of compaction on soil and plant growth in Wisconsin. Soil Till. Res, 29: 205-210.
18. Moravvej, K., Sarmadian, F. and Mahmoodi, Sh. 2003. Classification and mapping of varamin plain soils using satellite images derived from T.M. sensors. Iranian J. Natural Res. 56(3): 177-189.
19. Mullins, C.E., MacLeod, D.A., Northcote, K.H., Tisdall, J.M. and Young, I.M. 1990. Hard-setting soils: behaviour, occurrence, and management. In: Lal, R., Stewart, B.A. (Eds.), Soil Degradation. Adv. Soil Sci., Springer-Verlag, New York, pp. 37– 108.
20. Noellemeyer, E., Quiroga, A.R. and Estelrich. D. 2006. Soil quality in three range soils of the semi-arid Pampa of Argentina. Journal of Arid Environments. 65, 142–155.
21. Puppala, A.J., Acar, Y.B. and Tumay, M.T. 1995. Cone penetration in a very weakly cemented sand. J. Geotech. Engr. 121: 589–600.
22. Shukla, M.K., Lal, R. and Ebinger, M. 2006. Determining soil quality indicators by factor analysis. Soil Till. Res. 87: 194–204.
23. Sparling, G.P. and Schipper, L.A. 2002. Soil Quality at a National Scale in New Zealand J. Environ. Qual. 31: 1848–1857.
24. Sudduth, K.A., Kitchen, N.R., Drummond, S.T., Bollero, G.A., Bullock, D.G. and Chung, S. 2002. Soil strength sensing for quantifying within-field variability. American Society of Agricultural Engineers Meetings Papers, USDA.
25. Taylor, H.M., Roberson, G.M. and Parker, J.J. 1966. Soil Strength root penetration relations for medium and coarse-textured soil materials. Soil Sci. 102: 18-22.
26. Tormena, C.A., Da Silva, A.P. and Libardi, P.L. 1999. Soil physical quality of a Brazilian Oxisol under two tillage systems using the least limiting water range approach. Soil Till. Res. 52: 223-232.
27. Utseta, A. and Cid, G. 2001. Soil penetrometer resistance spatial variability in a Ferralsol at several soil moisture conditions. Soil Till. Res. 61: 193–202.
28. Van Genuchten, M.Th. 1980. A closed-form equation for predicting the hydraulic conductivity of unsaturated soils. Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J. 44, 892–898.
29. Van Genuchten, M.Th., Leij, F.J. and Yates, S.R. 1990. The RETC Code for Quantifying the Hydraulic Functions of the Unsaturated Soils. Res. Rep. 6002-91065. USEPA, Ada, OK.
30. Watts, C.W. and Dexter, A.R. 1997. The influence of organic matter in reducing the destabilization of soil by simulated tillage. Soil Till. Res. 42: 253-275.
31. Wu, L., Feng, G., Letey, J., Ferguson, L., Mitchell, J., Mccullough-Sanden, B. and Markegard, G. 2003. Soil management effects on the nonlimiting water range. Geoderma. 114: 401–414.
Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology
Volume 14, Issue 4
July and August 2012
Pages 951-959