Management of Irrigation Water Salinity in Greenhouse Tomato Production under Calcareous Sandy Soil and Drip Irrigation

Authors
A. M. Alomran 1
A. A. R. Al-Harbi 1
M. A. wahab-Allah 1
M. A. Alwabel 2
M. E. A. Nadeem 2
A. Al-Eter 2
1 Department of Soil Science, College of Food and Agricultural Sciences, King Saud University, P. O. BOX: 2460, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia.
2 Department of Plant Production, College of Food and Agricultural Sciences, King Saud University, P. O. BOX: 2460, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia
Abstract
A greenhouse experiment was conducted during the growing seasons (2008/2009 and 2009/2010) to investigate the effects of water quality and soil amendments, irrigation methods and rates on tomato (Solanum lycopersicon L. cv. Red Gold) yield and water use efficiency (WUE). Irrigation management treatments were fresh (0.86 dS m-1) and saline waters (3.6 dS m-1), surface and subsurface irrigation methods, 2, 4, and 6 L h-1 irrigation rates applied at the same irrigation duration and interval, and clay deposit, organic matter, and control amendment treatments. The results showed that differences among treatments were highly significant (P< 0.05) for tomato yield and WUE. The interactions between water quality and the other three factors were highly significant (P< 0.05). Applying fresh water and clay deposit amendments in sandy soil under subsurface drip irrigation at 2 L h-1 flow rate irrigation, water saving occurred due to improving soil water distribution in root zone. On the other hand, fresh application of saline water and clay deposit or organic matter amendments in sandy soil under subsurface drip irrigation method at 6 L h-1 flow rate, reduced both high cost of water desalinization and deleterious effect of saline water. Therefore, this management practice is recommended for greenhouse tomato production.

Keywords

1. Abdelgawad, G., Arslan A., Gaihbe A. and Kadori. F. 2005. The Effect of Saline Irrigation Water Management and Salt Tolerant Tomato Varieties on Sustainable Production of Tomato in Syria (1999-2002). Agric. Water Manage., 73: 39-53.
2. Abou-Gabal, A., Abd-Alsabour M. F., Mohamed F. A., and Ragab M. A. 1990. Feasibility of Sandy Soil Reclamation Using Local Tafla as Soil Conditioner. Ann. Agric. Sci. Cairo, 34(2): 1003-1011.
3. Allen, R. G, Pereira, L. S., Raes, D. and Smith, M. 1998. Crop Evapotranspiration: Guidelines for Computing Crop Water Requirements. FAO Irrigation and Drainage, Paper No. 56, FAO, Rome, Italy, 300 PP.
4. Al-Omran, A. M., Al-Harbi, AR., Wahb-Allah, M. A., Nadeem, M. A. and El-Eter, A. 2010. Impact of Irrigation Water Quality, Irrigation Systems, Irrigation Rates and Soil Amendments on Tomato Production in Sandy Calcareous Soil. Turk J. Agric. Fores., 34: 59 -73.
5. Al-Omran, A. M., Sheta, A. S., Falatah, A. M., and Al-Harbi, A. R. 2004. Clay Deposits for Water Management of Sandy Soils. Arid Land Res. Manage. 18: 171-183.
6. Al-Omran, A. M., Sheta, A. S., Falatah, A. M., and Al-Harbi, A. R. 2005. Effect of Drip Irrigation on Squash (Cucurbita pepo) Yield and Water-use Efficiency in Sandy Calcareous Soils Amended with Clay Deposits. Agric. Water Manage., 73: 43-55.
7. Amer, K. H. 2010. Corn Crop Response under Managing Different Irrigation and Salinity Levels. Agr. Water Manage., 97: 1553-1663.
8. Bauder, T. A., Cardon, G. E., Waskam, R. M. and Davis, R. M. 2004. Irrigation Water Quality. Cooperative Extension, Agriculture, Calorado State University, 506 PP.
9. Cuartero, J. and Fernandez-Munoz, R. 1999. Tomato and Salinity. Scientia Horticulturae, 78: 83-125.
10. FAO, 1977. Guidelines for Soil Profile Description. Second Edition, Rome. Italy. PP. 66
11. Golden Software. 2002. Contouring and 3D Surface Mapping for Scientists and Engineers. Version 7, Golden Software, Inc. www.goldensoftware.com
12. Harmanto, V. M., Salokhea, M. S. and Babelb, H. J. 2005. Water Requirement of Drip Irrigated Tomatoes Grown in Greenhouse in Tropical Environment. Agric. Water Manage., 71: 225–242.
13. Howell, T.A. 2006. Challenges in increasing water use efficiency in irrigated agriculture. In: International Symposium on Water and Land Management for Sustainable Irrigated Agriculture, April 4-8, 2006, Adana, Turkey. p. 11.
14. Kirda, C., Cetin, M., Dasgank, Y., Topcuk, S., Kamank, H., Ekicik, B., Derici, M. R. and Ozguven, A. I. 2004. Yield Response of Greenhouse-grown Tomato to Partial Root Drying and Conventional Deficit Irrigation. Agric. Water Manage., 69: 191–201.
15. Klute, A. 1986. Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 1. Physical and Mineralogical Methods. 2nd Edition, Agronomy No. 9, American Society of Agronomy, Madison, WI, USA. P. 1358.
16. Lamm, F. R., and Trooien, T. P. 2003. Subsurface Drip Irrigation for Corn Productivity: A Review of 10 Years of Research in Kansas. Irrig. Sci., 22: 195-200.
17. Maas, E. V. 1986. Salt Tolerance of Plants. App. Agric. Res., 1: 12-26.
18. Malash, N. M., Flowers, T. J. and Ragab, R. 2008. Effect of Irrigation Methods, Management and Salinity of Irrigation Water on Tomato Yield, Soil Moisture and Salinity Distribution. Irrig. Sci., 26: 313-323.
19. Olympios, C. M., Karapanos, I. C., Lionoudakis, K. and Apidianakis, I. 2003. The Growth, Yield and Quality of Greenhouse Tomato in Relation to Salinity Applied at Different Stages of Plant Growth. International Symposium on Managing Greenhouse Crops in Saline Environment. International Society for Horticultural Science (ISHS) Acta Horticulturae P. 609. Leuven 1, Belgium.
20. Reina-Sanchez, A., Romero-Aranda, R. and Cuartero, J. 2005. Plant Water Uptake and Water Use Efficiency of Greenhouse Tomato Cultivars Irrigated with Saline Water. Agric. Water. Manage., 78: 54-66.
21. Shannon, M. C. and Grieve, C. M. 1999. Tolerance of Vegetable Crops to Salinity. Scientia Horticulturae, 78: 5-38.
22. Tiwari, G. N. 2003. Greenhouse Technology for Controlled Environment. Narosa Publishing House, New Delhi, PP. 67–77.
Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology
Volume 14, Issue 4
July and August 2012
Pages 939-950