Investigation of Sand Drift Potential (Case Study: Yazd – Ardakan Plain)

Authors
T. Mesbahzadeh
H. Ahmadi
H. Ahmadi
Department of Range Science, Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj, Islamic Republic of Iran.
Abstract
Erosion by wind is one of the most important factors in desert environment. Prevailing winds can shift sand dunes and affect their accumulation. Also, wind regime determines the direction of sand dune mobility. The aim of this research was to investigate sand drift potential using sand movement models. For this research, wind data between 1986 and 2005 from the meteorological station of Yazd were acquired to examine sand drift potential (DP), and erosive storm winds through different methods. The sand drift potential values show that the resultant drift direction (RDD) is from southwest-west towards northeast-east. The unidirectional index value is 0.47. The Yazd – Ardakan plain is under the influence of a low energy wind regime (DP< 200 VU). The DP index should be considered for planning and development projects and conservation work. Calculations show that under a low energy wind regime, the amount of sand drift flow is 15.74 m3 m-1 year-1. The angular direction of RDD is 77°, measured clockwise from the geographical north. The trend of sand movement is observed following a clockwise pattern. With regard to the monthly sand rose, it is seen that the resultant drift potential is low in September and October (1.91-2.1) while the highest resultant drift potential occurs in May. The results obtained from the analysis of wind rose data indicated that the direction of prevailing winds in the Yazd basin is generally from west to north-west, and the storm winds have been generally directed northwest, and the frequency of winds of a velocity less than 6 m s-1 (threshold velocity) is 93.79% as observed from Yazd meteorological station.

Keywords

1. Ahmadi, H., Ekhtessassi, M. R., 2001. Investigation on Sand Dunes Resource. Research Plan Reports. 155PP.
2. Al-Awadhi, J. M., Al-Helal., A. and Al-Enezi, A. 2005. Sand Drift Potential in the Desert of Kuwait. J. Arid. Environ., 63: 425- 438.
3. Bagnold, R. A. 1941. The Physics of Blown Sand and Desert Dunes. Methuen, London. 265 pp.
4. Bullard, J. E. 1997. A Note on the Use of the ‘Fryberger Method’ for Evaluating Potential Sand Transport by Wind. J. Sediment. Res. 67(3A): 499-501.
5. Bullard, J. E., Thomas, D. S. G., Livingstone, I. and Wiggs, G. F. S. 1996. Wind Energy Variations in the Southwestern Kalahari Desert and Implications for Linear Dune Field Activity. Earth Surf. Process. Land. 21: 263-278.
6. Cooke, R. U. and Warren, A. 1993. Desert Geomorphology. UCL Press, London. 526 pp.
7. Ekhtessassi, M. R. and Ahmadi, H. 1994. Method of Origin Determination of Sand Dune in Iran. JRWM, 47:10-18.
8. Ekhtesasi, M. R., Ahmadi, H., Feiznia, S. and Busche, D. 2005. Wind Erosion, Facies and Damages in Yazd – Ardakan Plain. Iranian J. Natural Res., 57:567- 581.
9. Folk, R. L. 1971. Longitudinal Dunes of the Northwestern Edge of the Simpson Desert, Northern Territory, Australia. 1. Geomorphology and Grain Size Relationship. Sedimentology , 16: 5-54.
10. Fryberger, S. G. 1979. Dune Forms and Wind Regime. In: "A Study of Global Sand Seas", (Ed.): McKee, E. D.. Government Printing Office, Washington, US, PP. 137–160.
11. Fryberger, S. G. and Dean, G. 1979. Dune Form Sand Wind Regime. Professional Paper, United States Geological Survey, PP. 137–140.
12. Jeffrey, L. and Zobek, T. M. 2002. Climatic Factors Affecting Mobility and Stability of Sand Dunes. Proceedings of‌ CARS/GCTE-SEN Conference, International Center for Arid and Semiarid Lands Studies, Texas Tech University, Lubbock, Texas, USA Publication 2002. PP. 423-425.
13. Khalaf, F. I. and Al-Ajmi, D. 1993. Aeolian Processes and Sand Encroachment Problems in Kuwait. Geomorphology, 6: 111–134.
14. Khalili, A. 1992. Arid and Semiarid Regions of Iran. Proceedings of Seminar on the Problems of Iranian Deserts and Kavirs, Yazd, Iran, PP. 556-597.
15. Lancaster, N. 1998. Controls on Aeolian Dune Size and Spacing. J. Arid. Environ., 63: 425- 438.
16. Lancaster, N. 1995. Geomorphology of Desert Dunes. Physical Environment Series. Routledge, New York, NY. 290 pp.
17. Lancaster, N. 1999. Geomorphology of Desert Sand Seas. In Aeolian Environment Sediments and Landforms Goudie AS, Livingstone I, Stokes S (eds). Wiley: Chichester; 49–70.
18. McKee, E. D. 1979. A Study of Global Sand Seas. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1052. United States Department of Interior, Washington, DC.
19. Pearce, K. I. and Walker, I. J. 2005. Frequency and Magnitude Biases in the ‘Fryberger Model’ with the Implications for Characterizing Geomorphically Effective Winds. Geomorphology, 68: 39–55.
20. Pye, K. and Tsoar, H. 1990. Aeolian Sands and Sand Dunes. Unwin Hyman, London. 15: 449-450.
21. Rajabi, M. R., Rohani, F., Ekhtessassi, M. R. and Ghazanfarpoor, N. 2006. Morpho-dynamic Analysis of Wind Faces Using Spatial Sand Rose Model in Zabol and Zahak region, Iran. Biaban J., 11: 45-51.
22. Saqqa, W. A. and Saqqa, A. W. 2007. A Computer Program (WDTSRP) Designed for Computation of Sand Drift Potential (DP) and Plotting Sand Roses. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms. 32: 832–840.
23. Tsoar, H. and Blumberg, D. G. 2002. Formation of Parabolic Dunes from Barchan and Transverse Dunes along Israel’s Mediterranean Coast. Earth Surf. Processes Landforms. 27: 1147–1161.
24. Wang, X., Dong, Z., Zhang, J. and Chen, G. 2003. Grain Size Characteristics of Sand Dunes in the Central Taklimakan Sand Sea. Sediment. Geol., 161: 1 –14.
25. Yizhaq, H., Isenberg, O., Tsoar, H. and Karnieli, A. 2008. Morphology and Dynamics of Aeolian Mega-ripples in Nahal Kasuy, Southern Israel. Earth Sci. Rev., 57: 149–165.
26. Zareian, M. 2007. Investigation of the Sand Dune Morphodynamics in the South of Iran. MSc. Thesis, Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Karaj, Iran.
Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology
Volume 14, Issue 4
July and August 2012
Pages 919-928