Modelling Some Physical Characteristics of Pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) Fruit during Ripening Using Artificial Neural Network

Authors
M. R. Amiryousefi 1
M. Zarei 2
M. Azizi 2
M. Azizi 2
M. Mohebbi 1
1 Department of Food Science and Technology, Faculty of Agriculture, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, P. O. Box: 91775-1163, Mashhad, Islamic Republic of Iran.
2 Department of Horticulture, Faculty of Agriculture, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, P. O. Box: 91775-1163, Mashhad, Islamic Republic of Iran.
Abstract
Pomegranate is an important Iranian-native fruit, with many varieties cultivated. Although the volume of data on the importance of pomegranates in human nutrition has increased tremendously in the last years, the physical properties of the pomegranate fruit during fruit maturity have not yet been studied in detail. Thus, the present study aimed to evaluate changes in physical characteristics of six pomegranate fruits in three different stages from fruit set to ripening. Physical characteristics of pomegranate fruit including length to diameter ratio of fruit and calyx, peel and aril percentage, juice weight and percentage in a whole fruit in ‘Aghaye’ (A), ‘Faroogh’ (F), ‘Rabbab-e-Fars’ (RF), ‘Shahvare’ (S), ‘Shirin-e-Bihaste’ (SB) and ‘Shirin-e-Mohali’ (SM) were investigated. Different topologies of the artificial neural network were examined. Among different structures, a multilayer feed forward neural network based on 15 neurons in the single hidden layer with transfer function of tangent hyperbolic both in hidden layer and output layer and Levenberg-Marquardt learning rule was found to be the best model for predicting the physical characteristics of pomegranate fruit from the different cultivars. Results indicated that artificial neural network provides a prediction method with high accuracy. The correlation coefficients in the prediction of these physical characteristics were higher than 0.89.

Keywords

1. Abdullah, M. Z., Mohamad-Saleh, J., Fathinul-Syahir, A. S. and Mohd-Azemi, B. M. N. 2006. Discrimination and Classification of Fresh-Cut Starfruits (Averrhoa carambola L.) Using Automated Machine Vision System. J. Food Eng., 76(4): 506-523.
2. Al-Maiman, S. A., and Ahmad, D. 2002. Changes in Physical and Chemical Properties during Pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) Fruit Maturation. Food Chem., 76(4): 437-441.
3. Amiryousefi, M. R. and Mohebbi, M. 2010. Neural Network Approach for Modeling The Mass Transfer of Potato Slices During Osmotic Dehydration Using Genetic Algorithm. African J. Agric. Res., 5(1): 70-77.
4. Anonymous. 2005. Statistical Book of Agricultural of Iran. Iranian Statistical Centre, Tehran, Iran, http://eamar.sci.org.ir/index_e.aspx
5. Ata, M. M., Mohamed, M. A., El-Minir, H. K. and Abd-El-Fatah, A. I. 2009. Automated Classification Techniques of Galaxies Using Artificial Neural Networks Based Classifiers. In: International Conference Computer Engineering and Systems (ICCES), 15 January 2010, Cairo PP. 157-161.
6. Ben-Arie, R., Segal, N. and Guelfat-Reich, S. 1984. The Maturation and Ripening of The ‘Wonderful’ Pomegranate. J. Am. Soc. Hort. Sci., 109: 898-902.
7. Chen, C. R., Ramaswamy, H. S. and Alli, I. 2001. Prediction of Quality Changes During Osmo-Convective Drying of Blueberries Using Neural Network Models for Process Optimization. Drying Technol. Int. J., 19(3): 507-523.
8. Fadavi, A., Barzegar, M., Azizi, M. H. and Bayat, M. 2005. Physicochemical Composition of Ten Pomegranate Cultivars (Punica granatum L.) Grown in Iran. Food Sci. Technol. Int., 11(2): 113-119.
9. Gozlekci, S. and Kayank, L. 2000. Physical and Chemical Changes During Fruit Development and Flowering in Pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) Cultivar Hicaznar Grown in Antalya Region. Ciheam-Options Mediteraians, PP. 79-85.
10. Harde, H., Schumacher, W., Firbas, F. and Deffer, D. 1970. Strasburg’s Textbook of Botany. London: Chaucer.
11. Kashaninejad, M., Dehghani, A. A. and Kashiri, M. 2009. Modeling of Wheat Soaking Using Two Artificial Neural Networks (MLP and RBF). J. Food Eng., 91(4): 602-607.
12. Kulkarni, A. P. and Aradhya, S. M. 2005. Chemical Changes and Antioxidant Activity in Pomegranate Arils During Fruit Development. Food Chem., 93(2): 319-324.
13. Lou, W. and Nakai, S. 2001. Application of Artificial Neural Networks for Predicting The Thermal Inactivation of Bacteria: a Combined Effect of Temperature, pH and Water Activity. Food Res. Int., 34(7): 573-579.
14. Menhaj, M. B. 2008. Fundamentals of Neural Networks. 5th Edition,. Vol. 1, Industrial University of Amir Kabir (Tehran Polytechnic), Tehran.
15. Mitra, P., Barman, P. and Chang, K. 2011. Coumarin Extraction from Cuscuta reflexa using Supercritical Fluid Carbon Dioxide and Development of an Artificial Neural Network Model to Predict the Coumarin Yield. Food Bioprocess Technol., 4(5): 737-744.
16. Mohammadi, K., Eslami, H. R. and Dardashti, S. D. 2005. Comparison of Regression, ARIMA and ANN Models for Reservoir Inflow Forecasting Using Snowmelt Equivalent: (A Case Study of Karaj). J. Agric. Sci. Technol., 7: 17-30.
17. Mohebbi, M., Akbarzadeh Totonchi, M. R., Shahidi, F. and Poorshehabi, M. R. 2007. Possibility Evaluation of Machine Vision and Artificial Neural Network Application to Estimate Dried Shrimp Moisture. In 4th Iranian Conference on Machine Vision, Image Processing and Application, Mashhad, Iran.
18. Morimoto, T., De Baerdemaeker, J. and Hashimoto, Y. 1997. An Intelligent Approach for Optimal Control of Fruit-storage Process Using Neural Networks and Genetic Algorithms. Comput. Electron. Agric., 18(2-3): 205-224.
19. Movagharnejad, K. and Nikzad, M. 2007. Modeling of Tomato Drying Using Artificial Neural Network. Comput. Electron. Agric., 59(1-2): 78-85.
20. Ochoa-Martinez, C. I., Ramaswamy, H. S. and Ayala-Aponte, A. A. 2007. ANN-Based Models for Moisture Diffusivity Coefficient and Moisture Loss at Equilibrium in Osmotic Dehydration Process. Drying Technol. Int. J., 25(5): 775-783.
21. Razavi, S. M. A., Mousavi, S. M. and Mortazavi, S. A. 2003. Dynamic Prediction of Milk Ultrafiltration Performance: A Neural Network Approach. Chem. Eng. Sci., 58(18): 4185-4195.
22. Shulman, Y., Fainbertein, L. and Lavee, S. 1984. Pomegranate Fruit Development and Maturation. J. Hort. Sci., 48: 293-296.
23. Tehranifar, A., Zarei, M., Nemati, Z., Esfandiyari, B. and Vazifeshenas, M. R. 2010. Investigation of Physico-Chemical Properties and Antioxidant Activity of Twenty Iranian Pomegranate (Punica granatum L.) Cultivars. Sci. Hortic., 126(2): 180-185.
24. Thompson, M. L. and Kramer, M. A. 1994. Modeling Chemical Processes Using Prior Knowledge and Neural Networks. AIChE J., 40(8): 1328-1340.
25. Valero, C. and Ruiz-Altisent, M. 2000. Design Guidelines for a Quality Assessment System of Fresh Fruits in Fruit Centers and Hypermarkets. Agri. Eng. Int. CIGR. J. Sci. Res. Develop., 2:1-20.
Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology
Volume 14, Issue 4
July and August 2012
Pages 857-867