Dry Matter Partitioning, Growth Analysis and Water Use Efficiency Response of Oats (Avena sativa L.) to Excessive Nitrogen and Phosphorus Application

Authors
Jr. Amanullah 1
B. A. Stewart 2
1 Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Crop Production Sciences, Khyber Pakhtunkhwa Agricultural University, Peshawar, Pakistan.
2 Dryland Agriculture Institute, West Texas A and M University, Canyon, Texas, USA.
Abstract
Shoot:root ratio, dry matter partitioning, growth analysis, and water use efficiency of oat (Avena sativa L., cv. Walker) was investigated under excessive nitrogen (N) as 200 mg N kg-1 (N1P0), excessive phosphorus as 200 mg P kg-1 (N0P1), and combined 100 mg N+100 mg P kg-1 (N2P2), and the control (N0P0) as check in a pot experiment at Dryland Agriculture Institute, West Texas A and M University, Canyon, Texas, USA, during winter 2009-2010. The experiment was performed in completely randomized design (CRD) with three replicates. One week after emergence, 15 plantswere maintained per pot. Later, five plants were uprooted at 30, 60, and 90 days after emergence (DAE). The volume of each pot was 6,283 cm3, containing 2,000 g of potting mix (organic soil) pot-1. Excessive N applications had very negative effects on leaf, stem, and root and, consequently, on the total dry weight per plant of oat. The reduction in total plant dry weight with excessive N applications reduced crop growth rate. In contrast, excessive P applications had no negative effects on leaf, stem, root, and the total plant dry weight. Rather, excessive P applications had more favorable effects on leaf, stem, root, and total dry weight per plant at early growth stage. At later growth stages, combined N+P applied had more beneficial impact on leaf, stem, root and total dry weight per plant. The increase in total dry matter accumulation per plant showed positive relationship with absolute growth rate (AGR), crop growth rate (CGR), and net assimilation rate (NAR). The NAR showed negative relationship with increase in LAI and positive relationship with increase in CGR. Water use efficiency was increased with P application and showed positive relationship with increase in CGR.

Keywords

1. Anderson, E. L. 1987. Corn Root Growth and Distribution as Influenced by Tillage and Nitrogen Fertilization. Agron. J., 79: 544-549.
2. Ayed, I. A. and Mashhady, A. S. 1984. The Tolerance of Grass Forage Grown in Pots to Urea Applied on Calcareous Soils under Very Hot Dry Conditions. Fertilizer Res., 5: 175-180.
3. Baligar, V. C., Fagaria, N. K. and Elrashidi, M. 1998. Toxicity and Nutrient Constraints on Root Growth. Hort Sci., 33: 960-965.
4. Bosemark, N.O. 1954. The Influence of Nitrogen on Root Development. Physiol. Plant, 7: 497-502.
5. Braddy, N. C. and Weil, R. R. 2002. Nitrogen and Sulfur Economy of Soils. Soil Phosphorus and Potassium. In: "The Nature and Properties of Soils". Thirteen Edition, Prentice Hall, Pearson Education, Inc. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, USA, PP.592-637.
6. Comfort, S. D., Malzer, G. L. and Busch, R. H. 1988. Nitrogen Fertilization of Spring Wheat Genotypes? Influence on Root Growth a Soil Water Depletion. Agron. J., 80: 114-120.
7. Costa, C., Dwyer, L. M., Zhou, X., Dutilleul, P. Hamel, C. Reid, L. M. and Smith, D. L. 2002. Root Morphology of Contrasting Maize Genotypes. Agron. J., 94: 96-101.
8. Drew, M. C. 1975. Comparison of the Effects of a Localized Supply of Phosphate, Nitrate, Ammonium and Potassium on the Growth of the Seminal Root System, and the Shoot, in Barley. New Phytol., 75: 479–490.
9. Emam, Y. and Shekoofa, A. 2009. Responses of Barley Plants to Drying Soil under the Influence of Chlormequat Chloride. Res. Crops, 10: 516-522.
10. Evans, L. T. and Wardlaw, I. F. 1976. Aspects of the Comparative Physiology of Grain Yield in Cereals. Adv. Agron., 28: 301-359.
11. Fagaria, N. K., Baligar, V. C. and Wright, R. J. 1997. Soil environment and root growth dynamics of field crops. Recent Res. Devl. Agron., 1: 15-58.
12. Fagaria, N. K., Baligar, V. C. and Clark, R. B. 2006. Root Architecture. In: "Physiology of Crop Production". The Haworth Press, Binghamton, NY, USA, PP. 23-59.
13. Feil, B. and Geisler, G. 1988. Root Growth of Seedlings of Old and New Winter Wheat Cultivars and a Spelt Wheat at Varying Levels of Nitrogen. J. Agron. Crop Sci., 161: 264–272.
14. Jian-Ling, L., Wen-Hua, L., Zuo-Xin, Z., Hai-Tao, Z., Xin-Jun, W. and Na, M. 2007. Effect of Phosphate Fertilizer and Manure on Crop Yield, Soil P Accumulation, and the Environmental Risk Assessment. Agric. Sci. China, 6: 1107-1114.
15. Lucas, M. E., Hoad, S. P., Russell, G. and Bingham, I. J. 2000. Management of Cereal Root Systems. HGCA Research Review 43, Home Grown Cereals Authority, London, (http://www.hgca.com/document).
16. Marschner, H. 1995. Mineral Nutrition of Higher Plants. Academic Press, London, 889 PP.
17. Plaster, E. J. 2009. Plant Nutrition. In: "Soil Science and Management". 5th Edition, Delmar, 5 Maxwell Drive, Clifton Park, NY, USA, PP. 259-268.
18. Provin, T. L. and Pitt, J. L. 2010. Phosphorus too Much and the Plants May Suffer. Soil, Water and Forage Testing Laboratory at 345 Heep Centre, College Station, Texas, United States, (http://soil-testing-tamu.edu).
19. Robinson D., Linehan, D. J. and Gordon, D. C. 1994. Capture of Nitrate from Soil by Wheat in Relation to Root Length, Nitrogen Inflow and Availability. New Phytol., 128: 297–305.
20. Sadras, V. O. 2006. The N:P Stoichiometry of Cereal, Grain Legume and Oilseed Crops. Field Crops Res., 95: 13–29.
21. Steel, R. G. D. and Torrie, J. H. 1980. Principles and Procedures of Statistics. McGraw-Hill, NY, United States.
22. Troughton, A. 1962. The Root of Temperate Cereals (Wheat, Barley, Oats and Rye). Mimeographed Publication No. 2, Commonwealth Bur. Pasture Field Crops, Hurley, Berkshire, UK.
23. Welbank, P. J., Gibb, M. J., Taylor, P. J. and Williams, E. D. 1974. Root Growth of Cereal Crops. Part 2. In: "Rothamsted Exper. Stn. Report for 1973". Hertshire, Harpenden, UK, PP: 26-66.
Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology
Volume 15, Issue 3
May and June 2013
Pages 479-489