Optimization of Independent Parameters for Chickpea Threshing Using Response Surface Method (RSM)

Authors
K. Salari 1
R. Amiri Chayjan 1
J. Khazaei 2
J. Amiri Parian 1
1 Department of Agricultural Machinery Engineering, Faculty of Agriculture, Bu-Ali Sina University, P. O. Box: 6517833131, Hamedan, Islamic Republic of Iran.
2 Department of Agricultural Technical Engineering, College of Abouraihan, University of Tehran, Tehran, Islamic Republic of Iran.
Abstract
Kermanshah province is the main producer of various chickpea cultivars in Iran. In this study a laboratory peg-tooth thresher was employed for chickpea threshing. The effect of cylinder speed (9, 12, 15 m/s), concave clearance (12, 14, 16 mm), feed rate (80, 160, 240 kg/h) and material moisture content (5, 10, 15% w.b.) was studied on percentage of grain damage, threshing efficiency and percentage of seed germination. The experimental plan for optimization was prepared with response surface methodology technique with composite experiment design. The effects of all independent variables on the response variables were significant. The effect of cylinder speed was the most significant and followed by the moisture content. With increasing cylinder speed in the range of 9 to 15 m/s, the grain damage increased from 4.98 to 47.97%, threshing efficiency increased from 96.81 to 99.69% and seed germination decreased from 85.75 to 55.98%. With increasing moisture content, grain damage and threshing efficiency decreased but seed germination increased. With increasing feed rate and concave clearance, grain damage and threshing efficiency decreased while, seed germination increased. The optimized point was determined at the cylinder speed of 10.63 m/s, concave clearance of 13.74 mm, feed rate of 240 kg/h and moisture content of 12% (w.b.). In this condition, the optimum values of grain damage, threshing efficiency and seed germination were 3%, 98.3% and 84.29%, respectively.

Keywords

1. Ajav, E. A. and Adejumo, B. A. 2005. Performance Evaluation of an Okra Thresher. Agric. Eng. Int., VII: 1-8.
2. ASAE Standards. 2002. Standards Engineering Practices Data. 49th Edition, The Society for Engineering in Agricultural, Food, and Biological Systems, USA.
3. Asli-Ardeh, E. A., Gilandeh, Y. A. and Abbasi, S. 2009. Study of Performance Parameters of Threshing Unit in a Single Plant Thresher. Amer. J. Agric. Biol. Sci., 4(2): 92-96.
4. Bartsch, J. A., Haugh, C. G., Athow, K. L. and Peart, R. M. 1986. Impact Damage to Soybean Seed. Trans. ASAE, 29: 582-586.
5. Corp, D., Machado, S., Ball, D., Smilly, R., Petrie, S., Siemens, M. and Guy, S. 2004. Chickpea Production Guide (Dry Land Cropping System). EM 8971, Oregon State University, 14 PP.
6. FAOSTAT. 2010. Food and agricultural commodities production. Available on http: // Faostat. Org/.
7. Feiffer, A., Spengler, A., Döscher, W., Meier, W. F. and Lange, M. 2001. Fehleranalyse beim Mähdrusch. Getreide Magazi., 2: 116–119.
8. Ige, M. T. 1978. Threshing and Separation Performance of a Locally Built Cowpea Thresher. J. Agric. Engin. Res., 23: 45-51.
9. ISTA. 1999. International Rules for Seed Testing. Seed Sci. Technol., 27(Suppl): 25-30.
10. Kathleen, M., Carley, N., Kamneva, Y. and Reminga, J. 2004. Response Surface Methodology: CASOS Technical Report. CMU-ISRI, 04, Pittsburgh, USA, 136 PP.
11. Khazaei, J., Behrouzi lar, M., Rajabipour, A. and Mohtasebi, S. 2003. Effect of Impact Velocity, Moisture Content and Pod Size on Percentage of Damaged Grains and Threshed Pods in a Finger Type Combine Thresher. Iran. J. Agric. Sci., 34: 825-836.
12. Khuri, A. and Mukhopadhyay, S. 2010. Response Surface Methodology. Computational Statistics, 2: 128–149.
13. Klenin, N. I., Popov, I. F. and Sakun, V. A. 1986. Agricultural Machines. Kolos Publishers, Moscow, PP.453.
14. Liu, M. K., Stroshine, R. L., and Ting, E. C. 1990. Mechanical Properties of the Soybean Cotyledon and Failure Strength of Soybean Kernels. Trans. ASAE, 33: 559–566.
15. Myres, R. H. 2002. Response Surface Methodology. Wiley and Sons Inc., USA, PP.824.
16. Oplinger, E. S., Hardman, L. L., Oelke, E. A., Kaminski, A. R., Schulte, E. E. and Doll, J. D. 1990. Chickpea. University of Wisconsin-Madison, Wisconsin, PP.8.
17. Paulsen, M. R. 1978. Fracture Resistance of Soybeans to Compressive Loading. Trans. ASAE, 21: 1210-1216.
18. Petkevichius, S., Shpokas, L. and Kutzbach, H. D. 2008. Investigation of the Maize Ear Threshing Process. Biosys. Eng., 99: 532–539.
19. Poničan, J., Angelovič, M., Jech, J., Žitňák, M., Galambošová, J. and Findura, P. 2009. The Effect of the Design Concept of Combine Harvester Threshing Mechanism on the Maize Crop Threshing Quality. Savremena poljoprivredna tehnika, 35(4): 268-274.
20. Rani, M., Bansal, N. K., Dahiya, B. S. and Kashyap, R. K. 2001. Optimization of Machine-Crop Parameters to Thresh Seed Crop of Chickpea. Agric. Eng. J., 10(3 and 4): 151-164.
21. Sarrafian, M. R. 2009. Country Report of Iran. Fourth Session of the Technical Committee of APCAEM, Chiang Rai, Thailand, PP.34.
22. Shpokas, L. 2007. Research of Grain Damage Caused by High-performance Combine Harvesters. Motorization Power Industry Agric., 9: 168–177. (in Russian)
23. Singh, C. 1988. Modern Techniques of Raising Field Crops. Oxford and IBH Publishing, New Delhi, PP.251.
24. Singh, R. P. 1990. Status of Chickpea in World. Int. Chickpea Newsletter, 22: 10-16.
25. Sinha, J. P., Deehliwal, I. S., Sinha, S. N. and Anoop, D. 2009. Studies on Machine-Crop Parameters for Chickpea Seed Crop Threshing. Agric. Eng. Int. Manuscript #07026.
26. Siska, J. and Hurburgh, Jr. C. R. 1994. Prediction of Wisconsin Tester Breakage Susceptibility of Corn for Bulk Density and NIRS Measurements of Composition. Trans. ASAE, 37(5): 1577–1582.
27. Spokas, L., Steponavičius, D. and Petkevičius, S. 2008. Impact of Technological Parameters of Threshing Apparatus on Grain Damage. Agronomy Res., 6: 367–376.
28. Sudajan, S., Salokhea, V. M. and Triratanasirichai, K. 2002. Effect of Type of Drum, Drum Speed and Feed Rate on Sunflower Threshing. Biosys. Eng., 83(4): 413-421.
29. Tabatabaeefar, A., Aghagoolzadeh, H. and Mobli, H. 2003. Design and Development of an Auxiliary Chickpea Second Sieving and Grading Machine. Agric. Eng. Int. V: paper #03005.
30. Talebi, R., Fayaz, F., Mardi, M., Pirsyedi, S. M. and Naji, A. M. 2008. Genetic Relationships among Chickpea (Cicer arietinum) Elite Lines Based on Rapid and Agronomic Markers. Int. J. Agri. Biol., 10: 301–305.
31. Ukatu, A. C. 2006. A Modified Threshing Unit for Soya Beans. Biosys. Eng., 95(3): 371–377.
32. Vejasit, A. and Salokhe, V. M. 2004. Studies on Machine-Crop Parameters of an Axial Flow Thresher for Threshing Soybean. Agric. Eng. Int., PAPER #04 004. PP.12.
33. Wang, Y. J., Chung, D. S., Spillman, C. K., Eckhoff, S. R., Rhee, C. and Converse, H. H. 1994. Evaluation of Laboratory Grain Cleaning and Separating Equipment. Trans. ASAE, 37(2): 507–513.
34. Ziaulhaq, M., Iqbal, S., Ahmad, S., Imran, M., Niaz, A. and Bhanger, M. I. 2007. Nutritional and Compositional Study of Desi Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) Cultivars Grown in Punjab, Pakistan. Food Chem., 105: 1357–1363.
Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology
Volume 15, Issue 3
May and June 2013
Pages 467-477