Evaluation of Particleboard Properties Using Multivariate Regression Equations Based on Structural Factors

Authors
A. Enayati
F. Eslah
E. Farhid
Department of Wood and Paper Science and Technology, Faculty of Natural Resources, University of Tehran, Islamic Republic of Iran.
Abstract
The application of stepwise multivariate-linear regression models for determination of particleboard properties based on structural factors was studied. Poplar (Populus alba), Beech (Fagus orientaleis) and Hornbeam wood (Carpinus betulus) with dry density of 460, 630 and 790 kg/m3,respectively, were used as raw materials. Three levels of boards target density (520, 620 and 720 kg m-3) and urea formaldehyde (UF) resin (6, 7, and 8%) were compared. The variables were included in the regression equations of modulus of rupture (MOR), modulus of elasticity (MOE), shear strength, and thickness swell (TS) after 24 hours immersion based on the degree of importance. In order to obtain the optimum board density and resin content for each species, contour plots were drawn by Minitab 13 software. Regarding the results from contour plots, particleboards with density ranging from 520 to 620 kg m-3 and 6% resin had most of their mechanical properties within those required by the corresponding standards. Thickness swell values were higher than requirements. We suggest additional treatments such as using adequate amount of water resistant materials to improve TS after 24 hours immersion.

Keywords

1. Ashori, A. and Nourbakhsh, A. 2008. Effect of Press Cycle and Particleboard Made from the Underutilized Low-quality Raw Materials. Ind. Crop. Prod., 28: 225-230.
2. ANSI. 2009. Particleboard. American National Standard, ANSI A208.1-2009, National Composite Association, Lesburg, VA.
3. ASTM 1037 Standard. 1996. Standard Method for the Preparation of Extractive Free Wood. Designation D1105-84. Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Vol. 04-01 Wood.
4. Barboutis, J. A. and Philippou, J. L. 2007. Evergreen Mediterranean Hardwoods as Particleboard Raw Material. Build. Environ., 42:1183-1187.
5. Cook, D. F., and Chiu, C. C. 1997. Predicting the Internal Bond Strength of Particleboard, Utilizing a Radial Basis Function Neural Network. Eng Appl Artif Intell., 10(2): 171-177.
6. Dai, C., Yu, C. and Jin, J. 2008. Theoretical Modeling of Bonding Characteristics and Performance of Wood Composites. Part IV. "Internal Bond Strength". Wood Fiber Sci., 40(2): 146–160.
7. Dias, F. M., Nascimento, M. F., Martinez-Espinosa, M., Lahr, F. A. R. and Domenico Valarelli, I. 2005. Relation between the Compaction Rate and Physical and Mechanical Properties of Particleboard. J. Materials Res., 8(3): 329-333.
8. EN 310 Standard. 1993. Wood Based Panel. Department of Modulus of Elasticity in Bending and Bending Strength, European Committee for Standardization, Brussels, Belgium.
9. EN 312 Standard. 2003. Particleboards-Specifications. European Committee for Standardization, Brussels, Belgium.
10. EN 317 Standard. 1993. Particleboard and Fiberboards. Determination of Swelling in Thickness after Immersion in Water. European Committee for Standardization. Brussels, Belgium.
11. EN 323 Standard. 1999. Wood Based Panels. Determination of the Density. European Committee for Standardization. Brussels, Belgium.
12. EN 326 Standard. 1993. Wood Based Panels. Sampling, Cutting and Inspection. Sampling and Cutting of Test Pieces and Expression of Test Results. European Committee for Standardization. Brussels, Belgium.
13. Eslah, F., Enayaty, A. A., Tajvidi, M. and Faezipour, M. 2012. Regression Models for the Prediction of Poplar Particleboard Properties based on Urea Formaldehyde Resin Content and Board Density. J. Agr. Sci. Tech., 14: 1321-1329.
14. Fernández, F. G., Esteban, L. G., Palacios, P.D., Navaro, N. and Conde, M. 2008. Prediction of Standard Particleboard Mechanical Properties Utilizing an Artificial Neural Network and Subsequent Comparison with a Multivariate Regression model. Investigación Agraria: Sistemas y Recursos Forestales, 17(2): 178-187.
15. Hayashi, K., Ohmi, M., Tominaga, H. and Fukada, K. 2003. Effect of Board Density on Bending Properties and Dimensional Stabilities of MDF-reinforced Corrugated Particleboard. Wood Sci. Technol., 49: 398-404.
16. Hiziroglu, S., Jarusombuti, S. and Fuengvivat, V. 2005. Surface Characteristics of Wood Composites Manufactured in Thailand. Build. Environ., 39: 1359-64.
17. Hood, J. P. 2004. Changes in Oriented Strand board Permeability during Hot-pressing. Master’s Thesis Submitted to the Faculty of Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of: Master of Science in Wood Science and Forest Products.
18. Kalaycioglu, H., Deniz, I. and Hiziroglu, S. 2005. Some of the Properties of Particleboard from Paulownia. Wood Sci. Technol., 51(4), 410-414.
19. Kalogirou, S., Eftekhari, M. and Marjanovic, L. 2003. Predicting the Pressure Coefficients in a Naturally Ventilated Test Room Using artificial Neural Network. J. Build. Environ., 38: 399-407.
20. Kim, S. 2009. Environment-friendly Adhesives for Surface Bonding of Wood-based Flooring Using Natural Tannin to Reduce Formaldehyde and TVOC Emission. J. Biores. Technol., 100: 744–748.
21. Malinov, S., Sha, W. and McKeown, J. J.
2001. Modelling the Correlation between
Processing Parameters and Properties in
Titanium Alloys Using Artificial Neural
Network. Comput. Mater. Sci., 21: 375-394
22. Maloney, T. M. 1977. Modern Particleboard and Dry-process Fiberboard Manufacturing. Miller Freeman Pub., San Francisco, Calif (USA), 672 PP.
23. Nemli, G. 2002. Factors Affecting The Production of E 1 Type Particleboard. Turk. J. Agric. For. 26(1): 31-36.
24. Nemli, G., Yildiz, S. and Gezer, E. D. 2008. The Potential for Using the Needle Litter of Scotch Pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) as a Raw Material for Particleboard Manufacturing. J. Biores. Technol., 99: 6054–6058.
25. Rowell, P. M. 2005. Handbook of Wood Chemistry and Wood Composites. CRC Press, Felorida: Talor and Francies, 487pp.
26. Takuya, N., Amin, J. and Ansell, M. P. 2004. Image Analysis and Bending Properties of model OSB Panels as a Function of Strand Distribution, Shape and Size. Wood Sci Technol., 38(4): 297–309.
27. Wang, S. Y., Chen, T. Y. and Fann, J. D. 1999. Comparison of Internal Bond Strength and Compression Shear Strength of Wood-based Materials. J. Wood Sci., 45: 396–401
28. Zhou, D. 1990. A Study of Oriented Strand Board Made From Hybrid Poplar. Holz als Roh-und Werk Stoff., 48: 293-296.
Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology
Volume 15, Issue 7
November and December 2013
Pages 1405-1413