Experiments on Variable-mass Threshing of Rice in the Tangential-longitudinal-flow Combine Harvester

Authors
T. Zhong
L. Yaoming
W. Chenghong
Key Laboratory of Modern Agricultural Equipment and Technology, Ministry of Education and Jiangsu Province, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, Jiangsu, China.
Abstract
The existing studies of threshing process of combine harvesters adopt the assumption of constant mass, which is contradictory to the phenomenon of separation of grains and short stalks in actual threshing process. Therefore, the characteristics of threshing and separation are not accurately described. Aiming at this problem, this study established the tangential-longitudinal threshing and separation test-bed with tangential-flow device, auxiliary feed beater, and longitudinal-flow device of tangential-longitudinal-flow combine harvester and conducted experiments and analysis of rice threshing with feed rates of 5, 6, and 7 kg s-1. The results showed that the changes in rates of material flow along the arc-length of concave in tangential-flow device and longitudinal-flow device were equal to the changes in rates of material density with time. In the process of variable-mass and constant-mass rice threshing, when the feeding rates were 5, 6, and 7 kg s-1 in the test-bed, the flow rates from the tangential-flow device were 4.07, 5.01, and 5.95 kg s-1, respectively. The average power consumption of the tangential-flow drum in variable mass threshing process was higher than that in the constant mass threshing process by 2.16, 2.73, and 3.09kW, respectively. The flow rate at the outlet of the longitudinal-flow device was 3.34, 4.04, and 4.72 kg s-1, respectively. The average power consumption rate of the longitudinal-flow drum in variable mass threshing process was lower than that in the constant mass threshing process by 7.32, 10.44, and 12.17kW, respectively. The results of material flow rate and power consumption would offer the basis for the design of longitudinal-tangential flow threshing and separation device.

Keywords

1. Anil, J., Guruswamy, T. and Desai, S. R. 1998. Effect of Cylinder Speed and Feed Rate on the Performance of Thresher. J. Agr. Sci., 4: 1120–1123.
2. Burcev, P. 1963. Meshchersky's Equations in the General Theory of Relativity. BAC, 14: 124–126.
3. Godwin, R. J., Wheeler, P. N., O’Dogherty, M. J., Watt, C. D. and Richards, T. 1999. Cumulative Mass Determination for Yield Maps of Non-grain Crops. Comput. Electron. Agric., 23: 85–101.
4. Harrison, H. P. 1991. Rotor Power and Losses of an Axial Flow Combine. Trans. ASAE, 34(1): 60–64.
5. Hennens, D., Baert, J., Baerdemaeker, J. D. and Ramon, H. 2003. Development of a Flow Model for Design of a Momentum Type Beet Mass Flow Sensor. Biosys. Eng., 85(4): 425–436.
6. Huynh, V. M. and Powell, T. 1982. Threshing and Separating Process a Mathematical Model. Trans. ASAE, 20(1): 65–73.
7. Igathinathane, C., Womac, A. R., Sokhansanj, S. and Narayan, S. 2008. Knife Grid Size Reduction to Pre-process Packed Beds of High-and Low-moisture Switch Grass. Biores. Technol., 99: 2254–2264.
8. Kumara, A., Mohanb, D. and Patelb, R. 2002. Development of Grain Threshers Based on Ergonomic Design Criteria. Appl. Ergon., 33: 503–508.
9. Li, J., Yan, C. L. and Yang, F. F. 2006. Theoretical Model and Simulation of Threshing of Axial Unit with Axial Feeding. J. Jiangsu University:NSE, 27(4): 299–302.
10. Maertens, K. and Baerdemaeker, J. D. 2003. Flow Rate Based Prediction of Threshing Process in Combine Harvesters. Appl. Eng. Agric., 19(4): 383–388.
11. Miu, P. I. and Kutzbach, H. D. 2007. Mathematical Model of Material Kinematics in an Axial Threshing Unit. Comput. Electron. Agric., 58: 93–99.
12. Miu, P. I. 2008. Modeling and Simulation of Grain Threshing and Separation in Axial Threshing Units, Part II: Application to tangential feeding. Comput. Electron. Agric., 60(1): 105–109.
13. Mostofi, M. R. and Minaei, S. 2009. Mass Flow Rate Measurement System Performance on Potato Harvesters. J. Agri. Sc. Tech., 11(1): 259–274.
14. Rahimi, M. Rabiei, B. Samizadeh, H. and Kafi Ghasemi, A. 2010. Combining Ability and Heterosis in Rice (Oryza sativa L.). J. Agri. Sc. Tech., 12: 223–231.
15. Rasouli, F., Sadighi, H. and Minaei, S. 2009. Factors Affecting Agricultural Mechanization: A Case Study on Sunflower Seed Farms in Iran. J. Agri. Sc. Tech., 11: 39–48.
16. Saeid, S., Mansoor, M., Lar, B. and Alisadi, J. 2006. A New Design for Grain Combine Thresher. Int. J. Agri. Biol., 8(5): 680–683.
17. Sudajana, S., Salokhea, V. M. and Triratanasirichaib, K. 2002. Effect of Type of Drum, Drum Speed and Feed Rate on Sunflower Threshing. Biosys. Eng., 83(4): 413–421.
18. Su, X. Y., Wu, J. Y., Zhang, H. J., Li, Z. Q., Sun, X. H. and Deng, Y. 2012. Assessment of Grain Security in China by Using the AHP and DST Methods. J. Agri. Sc. Tech., 14: 715–726.
19. Szymanek, M. 2008. Evaluation of Quantitative and Qualitative Losses of the Cutting Process for Sweet Corn Kernels. Appl. Eng. in Agric., 24(5): 559–563.
20. Tang, Z., Li, Y. M. and Xu, L. Z. 2011. Effects of Different Threshing Components on Grain Threshing and Separating by Tangential-axial Test Device. Trans. CSAE, 27(3): 93–97.
21. Vejasit, A. and Salokhe, V. M. 2005. Studies on Machine-crop Parameters of an Axial Flow Thresher for Threshing Soybeans. Agricultural Engineering International: The CIGR Journal of Scientific Research and Development, Manuscript PM 04, 004.
22. Wacker, P. and Kutzbach, H. D. 2003. State of the Art of Combine Harvesters for grain Harvesting. Harvest Technol., 58(4): 234–235.
23. Yang, F. F., and Yan, C. L. 2008. Movement Analysis of Cereal in Axial Flow Threshing Roller Space. Trans. CSAE, 39(11): 48–50.
24. Zhang, R. C. and Sang, Z. Z. 2000. Simulation Research on the Movement of Cereal in Axial Threshing Space. Trans. CSAE, 31(1): 55–67.
Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology
Volume 15, Issue 7
November and December 2013
Pages 1319-1334