Applying Multinomial Logit Model for Determining Socio-Economic Factors Affecting Major Choice of Consumers in Food Purchasing: The Case of Mashhad

Authors
Department of Agricultural Economics, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, Mashhad, Islamic Republic of Iran.
Abstract
The aim of this study was investigation of the factors affecting the primary choice of consumers in food purchasing in Mashhad city by applying cross section data of 201 households in 2012. In this study, 56, 30, and 14% of the consumers chose healthiness of food, price of food, and taste of food, respectively, as the primary preference in food purchase. Results of applying multinomial logit model illustrated that older respondents and females were more careful for health than young respondents and males. Also, results indicated that the households with high income and high educational levels were more likely to choose healthy foods. Moreover, respondents who had knowledge of food health were more likely to select healthiness of foods. In addition, comparison of the findings of this study with similar studies indicates that results are analogous. Based on the results of this study, some recommendations are provided for policy makers and food producers.

Keywords


1. Ajzen, I. 1991. The Theory of Planned Behavior. Organ. Behav. Hum. Dec., 50: 179–211.
2. Ajzen, I. and Fishbein, M. 1980. Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior. Englewood Cliffs, Prentice-Hall, NJ.
3. Baker, G. A. 2003. Food Safety and Fear: Factors Affecting Consumer Response to Food Safety Risk. Int. Food. Agribus. Man., 6(1): 1–11.
4. Ben-Akiva, M. and Lerman, S. R. 1985. Discrete Choice Analysis: Theory and Application to Travel Demand. MIT Press, Massachusetts.
5. Cobanoglu, F., Karaman, A. D. and Tunalioglu, R. 2013. Critical Evaluation for Adoption of Food Safety Systems in the Turkish Dairy and Meat Processing Businesses. J. Agr. Sci. Tech., 15: 101-114.
6. Dosman, D. M., Adamowicz, W. L. and Hrudey, S. E. 2001. Socio-economic Determinants of Health and Food Safety-related Risk Perceptions. Risk Anal., 21(2): 307–317.
7. Da´ vila, D., Rodrı´guez, S. and Rodrı´guez, A. 2002. La Promocio´ N Turı´Stica Espacial Dentro de Un Destino Vacacional Homoge´Neo. Una Aplicacio´n a Canarias. Estudios de Economı´a Aplicada, 20(1): 45–60.
8. Ferto, I. and Szabo, G. G. 2002. The Choice of Supply Channels in Hungarian Fruit and Vegetable Sector. American Agricultural Economics Association 2002 Annual Meeting, Long Beach, California.
9. Flynn, J., Slovic, P. and Mertz, C. K. 1994. Gender, Race and Perception of Environmental Health Risks. Risk Anal., 14(6): 1101–1108.
10. Forutan Entrepreneurship Foundation. 2012. Comparison of World and Iran Consumption. Tebyan Institute of Culture and Information Website. www.tebyan.net
11. Fujimoto, K. 2005. From Women’s College to Work: Inter-organizational Networks in the Japanese Female Labor Market. Soc. Sci. Res., 34: 651–681.
12. Goktolga, Z. G., Bal, S. G. and Karkacier, O. 2005. Factors effecting primary choice of consumers in food purchasing: The Turkey case. Food Control., 17(11):884-889.
13. Greene, W. H. 1995. LIMDEP. Econometric Software. Bellfort, NY.
14. Greene, W. H. 1998. LIMDEP: A User’s Manual. Econometric Software, Inc. Plainview, New York.
15. Greene, W. H. 2002. Econometric Analysis. 5th Edition, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, pp.720-723
16. Haartsen, T., Groote, P. and Huigen, P. 2003. Measuring Age Differentials in Representations of Rurality in the Netherlands. J. Rural Stud., 19: 245–252.
17. Hatirli, S. A., Ozkan, B. and Aktas, A. R. 2004. Factors Affecting Fluid Milk Purchasing Sources in Turkey. Food Qual. Prefer., 15(6): 509–515.
18. Henson, S. and Traill, B. 1993. The Demand for Food Safety: Market Imperfections and the Role of Government. Food Policy, 18(2): 152–162.
19. Holm, L. and Kildevang, H. 1996. Consumers-views on Food Quality. A Qualitative Interview Study. Appetite, 27: 1–14.
20. Köster, E. P. and Mojet, J. 2007. Theories of Food Choice Development. In: "Understanding Consumers of Food Products", (Eds.): Frewer, L. and van Trijp, H.. Woodhead Publishing Limited, Abington, Cambridge, England, PP. 93–124.
21. Krewski, D., Slovic, P., Bartlettt, S., Flynn, J. and Mertz, C. 1994. Health Risk Perceptions in Canada: ERC 94-3, Environmental Risk Management Working Paper. University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
22. Luce, R. 1959. Individual Choice Behaviour: A Theoretical Analysis. New York, JohnWiley, and Sons. (eds.) JAI, Prees, PP: xii-153.
23. Luzar, E. J., Assane, D., Gan, C. E. and Henning, B. R. 1998. Profiling the Nature-based Tourist: A Multinomial Logit Approach. J. Travel Res., 37: 48–55.
24. Murcott, A. 1989. Sociological and Social Anthropological Approaches to Food and Eating. World Rev. Nutr. Diet, 55: 1–40.
25. Phu Tu, V., Husson, F., Sutan, A., Tu Ha, D. and Valentin, D. 2012. For me the Taste of Soy Is Not a Barrier to Its Consumption. And How About You? Appetite, 58: 914–921.
26. Pina, I. P. A., and , Dı´az Delfa, M. T. 2005. Rural tourism demand by type of accommodation. TOURISM MANAGE, 26: 951–959.
27. Pundo, O. M. and Fraser, C. G. 2003. Multinomial Logit Analysis of Household Cooking Fuel Choice in Rural Kenya: A Case of Kisumu District. 41st Annual Conference of the Agricultural Economic Association of South Africa (AEASA), October 2–3, 2003, Pretoria, South Africa.
28. Rahimi, S., Kamran Azad, S., and Karimi Torshizi, M. A. 2011. Omega-3 Enrichment of Broiler Meat by Using Two Oil Seeds. J. Agr. Sci. Tech., 13: 353-365.
29. Riddington, G., Sinclair, C. and Milne, N. 2000. Modelling Choice and Switching Behaviour Between Scottish Ski Centres. Appl Econ., 32: 1011–1018.
30. Schupp, A., Gillespie, J. and Reed, D. 1998. Consumer Choice among Alternative Red Meats. J. Food Distribution Res., 29(3): 35–43.
31. Seddighi, H. R., and Theocharous, A. L. 2002. A Model of Tourism Destination Choice: A Theoretical and Empirical Analysis. Tourism Mnage., 23: 475–487.
32. Shepherd, R. 1999. Social Determinants of Food Choice. Proc. Nutr. Soc., 58: 807–812.
33. Steiner, J. E. 1979. Human Facial Expressions in Response to Taste and Smell Stimulation. In: "Advances in Child Development and Behavior", (Eds.): Hayne, W. R. and Lewis, P. L.. Academic Press, New York, 13: 257–295.