Comparison of Mathematical Models for Describing the Growth of Baluchi Sheep

Authors
M. R. Bahreini Behzadi 1
A. A. Aslaminejad 2
A. R. Sharifi 3
H. Simianer 3
1 Department of Animal Sciences, Yasouj University, P. O Box: 75918-74831, Yasouj, Islamic Republic of Iran.
2 Department of Animal Sciences, Ferdowsi University of Mashhad, P. O Box: 91775-1163, Mashhad, Islamic Republic of Iran.
3 Department of Animal Sciences, Animal Breeding and Genetics Group, George-August-University Göttingen, 37075 Göttingen, Germany.
Abstract
The objectives of this study were to identify a suitable mathematical model for describing the growth curve of Baluchi sheep based on monthly records of live weight from birth to yearling; and to evaluate the efficacies of nonlinear mixed effect model (NLMM) and the nonlinear fixed effect model (NLM) methodologies. Growth models were fitted to a total of 16,650 weight–age data belonging to 2071 lambs. Five nonlinear growth functions of von Bertalanffy, Gompertz, Brody, Logistic, and Richards and two linear polynomial functions were applied. The growth models were compared by using the Akaike’s information criterion (AIC) and residual mean square (MSE). Among all nonlinear fixed effect models, the Brody function had the smallest AIC and MSE values, indicating the best fit for both sexes. The Brody fixed effect model compared with NLMM including one random effect of asymptotic mature weight. The model evaluation criteria indicated that the Brody mixed effect model fitted the data better than the corresponding fixed effect model. It can be concluded that, among the linear models, the polynomial of the third order and, among nonlinear models, Brody mixed model were found to best fit the Baluchi sheep growth data.

Keywords

1. Aggrey, S. E. 2009. Logistic Nonlinear Mixed Effects Model for Estimating Growth. Poul. Sci., 88: 276–280.
2. Ahmadi, H. and Mottaghitalab, M. 2007. Hyperbolastic Models as a New Powerful Tool to Describe Broiler Growth Kinetics. Poul. Sci., 86: 2461–2465.
3. Akaike, H. 1974. A New Look at the Statistical Model Identification. Automatic Control. IEEE Trans., 19: 716–723.
4. Akbas, Y., Taskin, T. and Demiroren, E. 1999. Comparison of Several Models to Fit the Growth Curves of Kivircik and Daglic Male Lambs. Turk. J. Vet. Anim. Sci., 23: 537-554.
5. Arango, J. A. and Van Vleck, L. D. 2002. Size of Beef Cows: Early Ideas, New Developments. Genet. Mol. Res., 1: 51-63.
6. Bahreini Behzadi, M. R. and Aslaminejad, A. A. 2010. A Comparison of Neural Network and Nonlinear Regression Predictions of Sheep Growth. J. Anim. Vet. Adv., 9: 2128-2131.
7. Bathaei, S. S. and Leroy, P. L. 1998. Genetic and Phenotypic Aspects of the Growth Curve Characteristics in Mehraban Iranian Fat-tailed Sheep. Small Rumin. Res., 29: 261–269.
8. Belsley, D. A., Kuh, E. and Welsch, R. E. 1980. Regression Diagnostics: Identifying Influential Data and Sources of Collinearity. Wiley, New York, PP. 99.
9. Bilgin, O. C. and Esenbuğa, N. 2003. Parameter Estimation in Nonlinear Growth Models, Hayvansal Üretim, 44: 81-90.
10. Bilgin, O. C., Emsen, E. and Davis, M. E. 2004a. Comparison of Non-linear Models for Describing the Growth of Scrotal Circumference in Awassi Male Lambs. Small Rumin. Res., 52: 155-160.
11. Bilgin, O. C., Esenbuga, N., Macit, M. and Karaoglu, M. 2004b. Growth Curve Characteristics in Awassi and Morkaraman Sheep. I. Comparison of Nonlinear Functions. Wool Tech. Sheep Breed., 52: 1-7.
12. Blasco, A. and Gomes, E. 1993. A Note on Growth Curves of Rabbit Lines Selected on Growth Rate or Litter Size. Anim. Prod., 57: 332-334.
13. Brown, J. E., Fitzhugh Jr., H. A. and Cartwright, T. C. 1976. A Comparison of Non Linear Models for Describing Weight-age Relationships in Cattle. J. Anim. Sci., 42: 810-818.
14. Craig, B. A. and Schinckel, A. P. 2001. Nonlinear Mixed Effects Model for Swine Growth. Prof. Anim. Sci., 17: 256-260.
15. Daskiran, I., Koncagul, S. and Bingol, M. 2010. Growth Characteristics of Indigenous Norduz Female and Male Lambs. J. Agr. Sci., 16: 62-69.
16. DeNise, R. S. K. and Brinks, J. S. 1985. Genetic and Environmental Aspects of the Growth Curve Parameters in Beef Cows. J. Anim. Sci., 61: 1431–1440.
17. Ersoy, I. E., Mendes, M. and Aktan, S. 2006. Growth Curve Establishment for American Bronze Turkeys. Arch. Tierz., 3: 293-299.
18. Eyduran, E., Kucuk, M., Karakus, K. and Ozdemir, T. 2008. New Approaches to Determination of the Best Nonlinear Function Describing Growth at Early Phases of Kivircik and Morkaraman Breeds. J. Anim. Vet. Adv., 7: 799-804.
19. Farid, A., Makarechian, M. and Sefidbakht, N. 1977. Crossbreeding of Iranian Fat-tailed Sheep: Lamb Performance of Karakul, Mehraban and Naeini breeds. J. Anim. Sci., 44: 542-548.
20. Fitzhugh Jr., H. A. 1976. Analysis of Growth Curves and Strategies for Altering Their Shape. J. Anim. Sci., 42: 1036-1051.
21. Gbangboche, A. B., Gleke-Kalai, R., Albuquerque, L. G. and Leroy, P. 2008. Comparison of Non-Linear Growth Models to Describe the Growth Curve in West African Dwarf Sheep. Animal, 2: 1003-1012.
22. Goliomytis, M., Orfanos, S., Panopoulou, E. and Rogdakis, E. 2006. Growth Curves for Body Weight and Carcass Components, and Carcass Composition of the Karagouniko Sheep, from Birth to 720 d of Age. Small Rumin. Res., 66: 222–229.
23. Kamalzadeh, A. and Shabani, A. 2007. Maintenance and Growth Requirements for Energy and Nitrogen of Baluchi Sheep. Int. J. Agri. Biol., 4: 535-539.
24. Karakus, K., Eyduran, E., Kum, D., Ozdemir, T. and Cengiz, F. 2008. Determination of the Best Growth Curve and Measurement Interval in Norduz Male Lambs. J. Anim. Vet. Adv., 7: 1464-1466.
25. Karkach, A. S. 2006. Trajectories and Models of Individual Growth. Demographic Res., 15: 347-400.
26. Keskin, I., Dagl, B., Sariye, V. and Gokmen, M. 2009. Estimation of Growth Curve Parameters in Konya Merino Sheep. S. Afr. J. Anim. Sci., 39: 163-168.
27. Keskin, S. and Daşkiran, I. 2007. Comparison of Growth Models in Norduz Female Kids. Ind. Vet. J., 84: 1066-1068.
28. Köhn, F., Sharifi, A. R. and Simianer, H. 2007. Modeling the Growth of the Goettingen Minipig. J. Anim. Sci., 85: 84-92.
29. Kum, D., Karakus, K. and Ozdemir, T. 2010. The Best Non-linear Function for Body Weight at Early Phase of Norduz Female Lambs. Trakia J. Sci., 8: 62-67.
30. Lambe, N. R., Navajas, E.A., Simm, G. and Bünger, L. 2006. A Genetic Investigation of Various Growth Models to Describe Growth of Lambs of Two Contrasting Breeds. J. Anim. Sci., 84: 2642–2654.
31. Lewis, R. M., Emmans, G. C. and Dingwall, W. S. 2002. A description of the Growth of Sheep and Its Genetic Analysis. Anim. Sci., 74: 51–62.
32. López de Torre, G., Candotti, J.J., Reverter, A., Bellido, M. M., Vasco, P., Garcia, L. J. and Brinks, J. S. 1992. Effects of Growth Curve Parameters on Cow Efficiency. J. Anim. Sci., 70: 2668–2672.
33. López de Torre, G. and Rankin, B.J. 1978. Factors Affecting Growth Curve Parameters of Hereford and Brangus Cows. J. Anim. Sci., 46: 604–613.
34. Malhado, C. H. M., Carneiro, P. L. S., Affonso, P. R. A. M., Souza Jr., A. A. O. and Sarmento, J. L. R. 2009. Growth Curves in Dorper Sheep Crossed with the Local Brazilian Breeds, Morada Nova, Rabo Largo, and Santa Inês. Small Rumin. Res., 84: 16–21.
35. Malhado, C. H. M., Carneiro, P. L. S., Cruz, J. F., Oliveira, D. F., Azevedo, D. M. M. R. and Sarmento, J. L. R. 2008a. Growth Curve in Anglo-Nubian Goats Raised in Caatinga: Nucleus Herd and Commercial Herd. Rev. Bras. Saúde Prod. An., 9: 662–671.
36. Malhado, C. H. M., Carneiro, P. L. S., Santos, P. F., Azevedo, D. M. M. R., Souza, J. C. and Affonso, P. R. M. 2008b. Growth Curve in Crossbred Santa Inês×Texel Ovines Raised in the Southwestern Region of Bahia State. Rev. Bras. Saúde Prod. An., 9: 210–218.
37. McManus, C., Evangelista, C., Fernandes, L. A. C., de Miranda, R. M., Moreno-Bernal, F. E. and dos Santos, N. R. 2003. Parameters for Three Growth Curves and Parameters that Influence Them for Bergamasca Sheep in the Brasilia Region. R.. Bras. Zootec., 32: 1207–1212.
38. Nelder, J. A. 1961. The Fitting of a Generalization of the Logistic Curve. Biometrics, 17: 89-110.
39. Nešetřilovà, H. 2005. Multiphasic Growth Models for Cattle. Czech J. Anim. Sci., 50: 347–354.
40. Oliveira, D. F. de., Cruz, J. F. da., Carneiro, P. L. S., Malhado, C. H. M., Rondina, D., Ferraz, R. de. C. N. and Teixeira Neto, M. R. 2009. Ponderal Development and Growth Traits of Anglonubian Goats Raised under Semi-intensive System. Rev. Bras. Saúde Prod. An., 10: 256-265.
41. Richards, F. J. 1959. A Flexible Growth Function for Empirical Use. J. Exp. Bot., 10: 290-300.
42. Ryan, T. P. 1997. Modern Regression Methods. John Wiley and Sons, Place?? PP??
43. Sarmento, J. L. R., Rezazzi, A. J., Souza, W. H., Torres, R. A., Breda, F. C. and Menezes, G. R. O. 2006. Analysis of the Growth Curve of Santa Ines Sheep. R.. Bras. Zootec., 35: 435–442.
44. SAS. 2009. User’s Guide, Release 9.2. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA.
45. Schinckel, A. P., Adeola, O. and Einstein, M. E. 2005. Evaluation of Alternative Nonlinear Mixed Effects Models of Duck Growth. Poult. Sci., 84: 256–264.
46. Schinckel, A. P. and Craig, B. A. 2002. Evaluation of Alternative Nonlinear Mixed Effects Models of Swine Growth. Prof. Anim. Sci., 18: 219–226.
47. Spilke, J., Mielenz, N., Krause, S. and Schüler, L. 2009. Statistical Modeling for Growth Data in Linear Mixed Models: Implications Derived from an Example of a Population Comparison of Golden Hamsters. Arch. Tierz., 52: 85-100.
48. Taylor, C. S. 1965. A Relation between Mature Weight and Time Taken to Mature in Mammals. Anim. Prod., 7: 203-220.
49. Taylor, C. S. and Fitzhugh Jr., H. A. 1971. Genetic Relationships between Mature Weight and Time Taken to Mature within a Breed. J. Anim. Sci., 33: 726–731.
50. Tekel, N., Sireli, H. D., Elicin, M. and Elicin, A. 2005. Comparison of Growth Curve Models on Awassi Lambs. Ind. Vet. J., 82: 179-182.
51. Topal, M., Ozdemir, M., Aksakal, V., Yildiz, N. and Dogru, U. 2004. Determination of the Best Nonlinear Function in Order to Estimate Growth in Morkaraman and Awassi Lambs. Small Rumin. Res., 55: 229–232.
52. Wellock, I. J., Emmans, G. C. and Kyriazakis, I. 2004. Describing and Predicting Potential Growth in the Pig. Anim. Sci., 78: 379–388.
Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology
Volume 16, Issue 1
January and February 2014
Pages 57-68