Determinants of Participation in Watershed Development Projects in Khorasan, Iran

Authors
1 Department of Education, Agricultural Support Services Company (ASSC), Ministry of Jihad-e-Agriculture, Tehran, Islamic Republic of Iran.
2 Department of Agricultural Extension and Education, College of Agriculture, Shiraz University, Shiraz, Islamic Republic of Iran.
3 Department of Rural Development Management, Faculty of Agriculture, Yasouj University, Yasouj, Islamic Republic of Iran.
Abstract
Study of factors affecting farmers' participation in watershed development is crucial for planners to ensure that projects fit local beliefs, values, and conditions. A cross sectional survey was conducted to identify factors influencing farmers’ participation in watershed development projects in the Khorasan region of Iran. A two-stage random sampling technique was employed to select a representative sample. A total of 139 farmers (76 participants, vs. 63 non-participants) from 65 project villages were selected and interviewed with the aid of a pre-tested interview schedule containing open-ended as well as closed questions. The discriminant analysis indicated that such variables as legal title to dry lands, hectares and value of dry lands, age, technical knowledge, level of education, visiting of the model farmers, and the horizon of watershed planning, could correctly classify about 80 percent of watershed farmers as participant vs. non-participants. For better understanding of these determinants, a multiple regression analysis was also carried out which indicated that "technical knowledge" and "hectares as well as value of dry land" were the key determinants of farmers' participation in watershed development projects.

Keywords


1. Ahmadvand, M., Karami, E. and Iman, M.T. 2011. Modeling the Determinants of the Social Impacts of Agricultural Development Projects. Environ. Imp. Assess. Rev., 31: 8-16.
2. Ahmadvand, M., and Karami, E. 2009. A Social Impact Assessment of the Floodwater Spreading Project on the Gareh-Bygone Plain in Iran: A Causal Comparative Approach, Environ. Imp. Assess. Rev., 29:126–36.
3. Azizi Khalkheili, T. and Zamani, Gh.H. 2009. Farmer Participation in Irrigation Management: The Case of Doroodzan Dam Irrigation Network, Iran, Agri. Water Manag., 96: 859 – 865.
4. Ben-Ayed, M. 2002. People’s Participation in a Rural Development Program in Tunisia: A Case Study. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Missouri-Columbia, MO, United States. Retrieved on August 4, 2007, from Pro-Quest Digital Dissertations Database (Publication No. AAT 3052144).
5. Damianos, D. and Giannakopoulos, N. 2002. Farmers’ Participation in Agri-environmental Schemes in Greece. British Food J., 104: 261–274.
6. Dolisca, F., Carter, D.R., McDaniel, J.M., Shannon, D.A. and Jolly, C.M. 2006. Factors Influencing Farmers’ Participation in Forestry Management Programs: A Case Study from Haiti. Forest Ecol. and Manag., 236: 324–331.
7. Faham, E., Hosseini, S.M. and Darvish, A.K. 2008. Analysis of Factors Influencing Rural People's Participation in National Action Plan for Sustainable Management of Land and Water Resources in Hable-Rud Basin, Iran. Amer. J. of Agri. and Biol. Sci., 3(2): 457-461.
8. Foltz, R.C. 2002. Iran’s Water Crisis: Cultural, Political, and Ethical Dimensions. J. of Agri. and Environ. Ethic., 15:357-380.
9. Forouzani, M. and Karami, E. 2011. Agricultural Water Poverty Index and Sustainability. Agro. for Sustain. Devel., 31(2):415-431.
10. Hope, R.A. 2007. Evaluating Social Impacts of Watershed Development in India. World Devel., 35: 1436-1449.
11. Karami, E. and Hayati, D. 2005. Rural Poverty and Sustainability: The Case of Groundwater Depletion in Iran. Asian J. of Water, Environ. and Poll., 2: 51-61.
12. Keshavarz, M., Karami, E. and Vanclay, F. 2013. The Social Experience of Drought in Rural Iran. Land Use Policy, 30: 120-129.
13. Khalighi, N. and Ghasemi, T. 2004. Analysis of Effect of Socio-economic Problems on Level of Stock Breeders' Participation in Range Management Plans in North Golestan Province, Iran. J. Agri. and Natu. Res. Sci., 11: 181-190.
14. McMillan, M. B., Hoban, T. J., Clifford, W. B. and Brant, M. R. 1996. Social and Demographic Influences of Environmental Attitudes. South Rural Soc., 13:89-107.
15. Mohammadnia, M. and Kowsar, A. 2003. Clay Translocation in Artificial Recharge of a Groundwater System in the Southern Zagros Mountain, Iran. Mountain Res. and Devel., 23: 50-55.
16. Motevalli, H. 2002. Analysis of Factors Influencing Attraction of Villagers' Participation in Desertification Plans in Semnan Province. Forest Range Quar., 56: 50-60
17. Nature. 2000. Benefits of Increased Public Participation (Editorial). Nature 405 (6784): 259-260.
18. Ninan, K.N. and Lakshmikanthamma, S. 2001. Social Cost-benefit Analysis of a Watershed Development Project in Karnataka, India. Ambio 30: 157-161.
19. Omid, M. H., Akbari, M., Zarafshani, K., Eskandari, GH. H. and Fami, H. SH. 2012. Factors Influencing the Success of Water User Association in Iran: A case of Mogan, Tajan and Varamin. J. of Agri. Sci. Tech., 14:27-36.
20. Patten, Mildred. L. 2002. Proposing Empirical Research. Los Angeles: Pyrczak Publishing.
21. Qiao, G., Zhao, L. and Klein K.K. 2009. Water User Associations in Inner Mongolia: Factors that Influence Farmers to Join. Agri. Water Manag., 96: 822-830.
22. Salam, M.A., Noguchi, T. and Koike, M. 2005. Factors Influencing the Sustained Participation of Farmers in Participatory Forestry: A Case Study in Central Sal Forests in Bangladesh. J. of Environ. Manag.,74: 43–51.
23. Sharma, C. and Sisodia, S.S. 2008. Peoples' Participation in Watershed Development Program: A Case Study of Rajasthan. Indian Res. J. of Ext. Edu., 8: 71-72.
24. Sharifzadeh, M., Zamani, GH. H., Khalili, D. and Karami, E. 2012. Agricultural Climate Information Use: An Application of the Planned Behavior Theory. J. of Agri, Sci. Tech., 14:479-492.
25. Webler, T. and Tuler, S. 2001. Public Participation in Watershed Management Planning: Views on Process From People in the Field. Res. in Human Ecol., 8: 29-39.
26. Wondolleck, J. and Yaffee, S. 2000. Making Collaboration Work: Lessons from Innovation in Natural Resource Management. Washington DC: Island Press.
27. World Bank. 2006. Sustainable Land Management: Challenges, Opportunities and Trade-offs, Washington, DC 20433, p: 14. www.siteresources. worldbank.org/inTARD/Resources/Sustainable land_ management_ebool.pdf.
28. Yercan, M. 2003. Management Turning-over and Participatory Management of Irrigation Schemes: A Case Study of the Gediz River Basin in Turkey. Agri. Water Manag., 62: 205-214.
39. Zarafshani, K., Alibaygi, A.H. and Afshar, N. 2008. The Utility of Discriminant Analysis for Prediction Farmers' Intentions to Participation in Farmer-managed Irrigation Systems in Iran. J. of Appl. Sci., 8: 697-701.