How Quantitative and Qualitative Traits of Thomson Navel Orange Affected by Citrus Red Mite, Panonychus citri

Authors
1 Department of Plant Protection, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Islamic Republic of Iran.
2 Department of Entomology, Faculty of Agriculture, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Islamic Republic of Iran
Abstract
To examine the effect of Citrus Red Mite (CRM) damage on quantitative and qualitative characteristics of Thomson navel orange Citrus sinensis (L.) Osbeck, paired-treatment experiment, multiple treatment experiment, and regression/correlation methods were used. There were significant differences among the treatments in paired-treatment and multiple treatment experiments in terms of the average population per leaf of CRM of different life ages and concentration of chlorophyll in the leaves. Also, there were significant differences among the treatments in multiple treatment experiment in terms of the Total Soluble Solids (TSSs) of the fruit extract. In control treatment of the paired-treatment experiment, the highest concentration of chlorophyll (79.13±1.06) was observed when the population density of CRM was 0.48±0.09 per leaf. With increasing the mean number of CRM to 10.59±1.09 per leaf, chlorophyll content was decreased to 62±1.15. Furthermore, the results showed that the storage life of the fruits in treatments with mean number of 6.33±1.8 mites per leaf was significantly reduced. The results of regression and correlation analysis on chlorophyll showed significant and negative relationship between these parameters and CRM population density. The results indicated that increasing the population density of CRM to 10.59±1.09 per leaf at the beginning of the season caused fruit drop and dry twigs. In addition, by increasing population density of CRM to 5.72±0.43 per leaf, the storage capability of the fruits was significantly reduced.

Keywords

Subjects


1. Acante, V. 2010, Review of the phytophagous Mites Collected on Citrus in the World. Acarologia, 50: 221-241.
2. Albrigo, L. G., Childers, C. C. and Syvertsen, P. 1981. Structural Damage to Citrus Leaves from Spider Mite Feeding. Proceedings of the International Society of Citriculture, 2: 649−652.
3. AOAC. 2005. Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International. 18th Edition, Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Maryland, MD.
4. Arya, SP. N. 2000. Spectrophotometric Methods for the Determination of Vitamin C. Analytica Chimica Acta. 17: 1-14.
5. Childers, C. C., Mccoy, C. W., Nigg, H., Stansly, N. and Rogers, M. E. 2007. Florida Pest Management Guide: Rust Mites, Spider Mites, and other Phytophagous Mites. University of Florida, http://edis.ifas.ufl.edu/CG002.
6. Darbemamieh, M., Kamali, K. and Fathipour, Y. 2011. Population Abundance and Seasonal Activity of Zetzellia pourmirzai (Acari: Stigmaeidae) and its Preys Cenopalpus irani and Bryobia rubrioculus (Acari: Tetranychidae) in Sprayed Apple Orchards of Kermanshah, Iran. J. Agr. Sci. Tech.,13, 143−154
7. Gotoh, T. and Kubota, M. 1997. Population Dynamics of the Citrus Red Mite, Panonychus citri (McGregor) (Acari: Tetranychidae) in Japanese Pear Orchards. Exp. Appl. Acarol., 21, 343−356.
8. Hall, D. G. and Simms, M. K. 2003. Damage by Infestations of Texas Citrus Mite (Acari: Tetranychidae) and its Effect on the Life of ‘Valencia’Leaves in an Irrigated Citrus Grove. Florida Entomol., 86(1), 15−28.
9. Hare, J. D. and Youngman, R. 1987. Gas Exchange of Orange (Citrus sinensis) Leaves in Response to Feeding Injury by the Citrus Red Mite (Acari: Tetranychidae) on Lemons in Southern California. J. Econ. Entomol., 80, 1249−1253.
10. Hare, J. D., Pherson, J. E., Clemens, T., Menge, J. A., Coggins, Jr., Embleton, T. W. and Meyer, J. L. 1990. Effects of Managing Citrus Red Mite (Acari: Tetranychidae) and Cultural Practices on Total Yield, Fruit Size and Crop Value of ‘Navel’ orange. J. Econ. Entomol., 83, 976−984.
11. Hillhouse, T. L. and Pitre, H. N. 1974. Comparison of Sampling Techniques to Obtain Measurements of Insect Populations on Soybeans. J. Econ. Entomol., 67, 411−414.
12. Jamieson, L. E., Charles, J. G., Stevens. P. S., McKenna, C. E. and Bawden, R. 2005. Natural Enemies of Citrus Red Mite (Panonychus citri) in Citrus Orchards. New Zealand Plant Protec., 58, 299−305.
13. Jarosik, V., Honek, A. and Dixon, A. F. G. 2003. Natural Enemy Ravine Revisited: The Importance of Sample Size for Determining Population Growth. Ecol. Entomol., 28: 85–91.
14. Khodayari, S., Fathipour, Y., Kamali, K. and Naseri, B. 2010. Seasonal Activity of Zetzellia mali (Stigmaeidae) and its Preys Eotetranychus frosti (Tetranychidae) and Tydeus longisetosus (Tydeidae) in Unsprayed Apple Orchards of Maragheh, Northwestern of Iran. J. Agr. Sci. Tech. 12, 549–558.
15. Liu, Y, H. 1992. Effects of Citrus Leaf Injury on Citrus Red Mite (Panonychus citri) population. J. Southwest Agri. Univ., 14, 230–234.
16. Naseri, B., Fathipour, Y. and Talebi, A. A. 2009. Population Density and Spatial Distribution Pattern of Empoasca Decipiens (Hemiptera: Cicadellidae) on Different Bean Species. J. Agr. Sci. Tech., 11, 239–248.
17. Niu, J. Z., Liu, G. Y., Dou, W. and Wang, J. J. 2011. Susceptibility and Activity of Glutathiones Transferases in nine Field Populations of Panonychus citri (Acari: Tetranychidae) to Pyridaben and Azocyclotin. Florida Entomol., 94, 321–329.
18. Pedigo, L. P. and Buntin, G. D. 1994. Handbook of Sampling Methods for Arthropods in Agriculture. CRC Press, London, 714 PP.
19. Prischmann, D. A., James, D. G., Wright, L. C., Teneyck. R. D. and Snyder. W. E. 2005. Effect of Chlorpyrifos and Sulfur on Spider Mites (Acari: Tetranychidae) and their Natural Enemies. Biol. Cont., 33, 324−334.
20. Zhang, Z. Q. 2003. Mites of Greenhouses: Identification, Biology and Control. CABI Publishing, Wallingford, UK, 240 PP.