Volume 22, Issue 2 (2020)
JAST 2020, 22(2): 389-400 |
Back to browse issues page
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Papzan A, Geravandi S. Sustainability Analysis of Family Farming System in Kermanshah Province: Using DPSIR Framework. JAST 2020; 22 (2) :389-400
URL: http://jast.modares.ac.ir/article-23-21682-en.html
URL: http://jast.modares.ac.ir/article-23-21682-en.html
1- Department of Agricultural Extension and Education, Faculty of Agriculture, Razi University, Kermanshah, Islamic Republic of Iran.
2- Department of Agricultural Extension and Education, Faculty of Agriculture, Razi University, Kermanshah, Islamic Republic of Iran. , sh.geravandi1@gmail.com
2- Department of Agricultural Extension and Education, Faculty of Agriculture, Razi University, Kermanshah, Islamic Republic of Iran. , sh.geravandi1@gmail.com
Abstract: (2196 Views)
This study aimed to address analysis and zoning of sustainability of family farming system in Kermanshah province. To achieve this objective, two steps were taken: (1) Identification of a comprehensive framework to measure the sustainability of family farming system, and (2) Evaluation criteria and sub-criterion weight for the proposed framework by conducting Fuzzy Analytical Hierarchy Process (FAHP). In this regard, firstly, 12 agrarian experts who had theoretical and practical experiences were selected by purposed sampling for FAHP. Secondly, descriptive cross-sectional survey was carried out on family farming system. Results of FAHP revealed that management, capitals, vulnerabilities, and stresses were of utmost importance in a context of sustainability of family farming system, respectively. According to the findings, Eslamabad-e Gharb and Harsin with scores of 72.91 and 58.76 have high sustainability. In contrast, Qasr-e Shirin (20.92) showed high unsustainability. Furthermore, Sarpol-e Zahab, Kermanshah, and Javanroud with values of, respectively, 57.95, 57.37, and 52.92 lie in the middle of the spectrum.
Article Type: Original Research |
Subject:
Agricultural Extension and Education/Rural Development
Received: 2018/06/3 | Accepted: 2019/03/12 | Published: 2020/03/1
Received: 2018/06/3 | Accepted: 2019/03/12 | Published: 2020/03/1
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |