<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE ArticleSet PUBLIC "-//NLM//DTD PubMed 2.7//EN" "https://dtd.nlm.nih.gov/ncbi/pubmed/in/PubMed.dtd">
<ArticleSet>
<Article>
<Journal>
				<PublisherName>Tarbiat Modares University</PublisherName>
				<JournalTitle>Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology</JournalTitle>
				<Issn>1680-7073</Issn>
				<Volume>21</Volume>
				<Issue>2</Issue>
				<PubDate PubStatus="epublish">
					<Year>2019</Year>
					<Month>03</Month>
					<Day>01</Day>
				</PubDate>
			</Journal>
<ArticleTitle>Reference Evapotranspiration Estimation Using Locally Adjusted Coefficient of Angstrom’s Radiation Model in an Arid-Cold Region</ArticleTitle>
<VernacularTitle>تخمین تبخیرتعرق مرجع با استفاده از ضرایب تعدیل شده محلی معادله تابش آنگستروم در یک منطقه سرد و خشک</VernacularTitle>
			<FirstPage>487</FirstPage>
			<LastPage>499</LastPage>
			<ELocationID EIdType="pii">16281</ELocationID>
			
			
			<Language>EN</Language>
<AuthorList>
<Author>
					<FirstName>M.</FirstName>
					<LastName>Raoof</LastName>
<Affiliation>Water Engineering Department, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Islamic Republic of Iran.</Affiliation>

</Author>
<Author>
					<FirstName>J.</FirstName>
					<LastName>Azizi Mobaser</LastName>
<Affiliation>Water Engineering Department, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Islamic Republic of Iran.</Affiliation>

</Author>
</AuthorList>
				<PublicationType>Journal Article</PublicationType>
		<Abstract>Acceptable estimation of reference Evapotranspiration (ET&lt;sub&gt;0&lt;/sub&gt;) values by the Penman-Monteith FAO (PM FAO) equation requires accurate solar radiation (R&lt;sub&gt;s&lt;/sub&gt;) data. R&lt;sub&gt;s&lt;/sub&gt; values could be estimated using the Angstrom’s radiation model. The aim of this study was to determine the a&lt;sub&gt;s&lt;/sub&gt; and b&lt;sub&gt;s&lt;/sub&gt; coefficient (as Angstrom’s parameters) for the Ardabil plain as an arid and cold region. Angstrom’s radiation model and PM FAO equation were calibrated for the study area, by optimizing the a&lt;sub&gt;s&lt;/sub&gt; and b&lt;sub&gt;s&lt;/sub&gt; parameter using Generalized Reduced Gradient (GRG) method. Measured R&lt;sub&gt;s&lt;/sub&gt;data were collected from the Ardabil Synoptic Station and measured ET&lt;sub&gt;0 &lt;/sub&gt;data were determined using three lysimeters that were installed at the Hangar Research Station. Calibrated results showed that optimized a&lt;sub&gt;s&lt;/sub&gt; and b&lt;sub&gt;s&lt;/sub&gt; values were 0.117 and 0.384, respectively. Compared to the original models, errors including RMSE, AE and RE values were decreased and fitted parameters including R&lt;sup&gt;2&lt;/sup&gt; and regression line slope (m) were improved in the calibrated models. The GMER values for the original models showed that Angstrom’s radiation model overestimated the R&lt;sub&gt;s&lt;/sub&gt; values and PM FAO equation underestimated the ET&lt;sub&gt;0&lt;/sub&gt; values. Locally calibrated models estimated R&lt;sub&gt;s&lt;/sub&gt; and ET&lt;sub&gt;0&lt;/sub&gt; values better than the original one. Nash-Sutcliffe efficiency coefficient (NSE) values proved that R&lt;sub&gt;s&lt;/sub&gt; and ET&lt;sub&gt;0&lt;/sub&gt; estimation by the original models were not satisfactory, but were acceptable in the case of the calibrated models. However, calibration of Angstrom’s radiation model and PM FAO equation is necessary for each region.&lt;br&gt;</Abstract>
		<ObjectList>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Penman-Monteith</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Model calibration</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">validation</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Lysimeter</Param>
			</Object>
			<Object Type="keyword">
			<Param Name="value">Ardabil</Param>
			</Object>
		</ObjectList>
<ArchiveCopySource DocType="pdf">https://jast.modares.ac.ir/article_16281_3a1051d7bc1590ef30337746a52506b9.pdf</ArchiveCopySource>
</Article>
</ArticleSet>
