Determining Revealed Comparative Advantage and Target Markets for Iran's Stone Fruits

Authors
H. Khaksar Astaneh 1
M. Yaghoubi 2
V. Kalateharabi 2
1 Department of Urban Economics, Iranian Academic Center for Education, Culture and Research (ACECR), Mashhad, Islamic Republic of Iran.
2 Department of Economics, University of Sistan and Baluchestan, Zahedan, Islamic Republic of Iran.
Abstract
This study investigated the export status of stone fruits in Iran during 1997 to 2010. Export trends and revealed comparative advantage of indices, namely, Revealed Comparative Advantage (RCA), Revealed Symmetric Comparative Advantage (RSCA), and Relative Export Advantage (RXA) as well as Trade Mapping (TM) were investigated for cherries, plums, peaches, and apricots. Target markets for these products were ranked using numerical taxonomies. The results showed that Iran had export's comparative advantage for stone fruits only in 2007 and 2010. But, this index had a positive growth for the stone fruits in those years, indicating an increasing trend in the export status of these products. Trade mapping analysis indicates that although the export market for these products has declined during the period studied, Iran has taken a greater share of the market and is among the winner groups. The principal export markets in decreasing order were found to be Germany, The UK, France, Italy, the Netherlands, Russia, Saudi Arabia, Bahrain, Switzerland, the UAE, and Afghanistan.

Keywords

1. Amirteymouri, S., Shemshadi, K. and Khalilian, S. 2012. Place of Iran in Export of Fennel: The Export Comparative Advantage Approach. J. Agr. Econ. Res., 3(4): 83-97.
2. Arias Segura, J. 2001. Performance Indicators of International Agrifood Trade in the Hemisphere. Revealed Comparative Advantages. Policies and Trade Specialist, IICA, COMUNIICA, Año 4, N°15, 21-23. Avalable at:
http://repiica.iica.int/docs/B1830I/B1830I.PDF
3. Balassa, B. 1965. Trade Liberalisation and “Revealed” Comparative Advantage1. The Manchester School of Economic and Social Studies , 33(2): 99-123.
4. Batra, A. and Khan, Z. 2009. Revealed Comparative Advantage: An Analysis for India and China. Working Paper No. 168, Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations (ICRIER), New Delhi.
5. Brasili, A., Epifani, P. and Helg, R. 2000. On the Dynamics of Trade Patterns. De Economist, 148(2): 233-258.
6. Brewer, P. 2001. International Market Selection: Developing a Model from Australian Case Studies. International Business Review, 10: 155–174.
7. Hirschman, A. O. 1964. The Paternity of an Index. The American Economic Review, 54(5): 761-762.
8. United Nations Commodity Trade Statistics Database: http://comtrade.un.org/db/
9. FAOSTAT: http://faostat.fao.org/site/567/default.aspx#ancor
10. Kathuria, L. M. 2013. Analyzing Competitiveness of Clothing Export Sector of India and Bangladesh: Dynamic Revealed Comparative Advantage Approach. Competitiveness Review, 23(2): 131 – 157.
11. Kuldilok, K. S., Dawson, P. J. and Lingard, J. 2013. The Export Competitiveness of the Tuna Industry in Thailand. British Food Journal, 115(3): 328 – 341.
12. Laursen, K. 1998. Revealed Comparative Advantage and the Alternatives as Measures of International Speculation. Working Paper, No. 98-30, Danish Research Unit for Industrial Dynamic (DRUID), ISBN (87-7873-069-4) working paper, No. 98-30.
13. Řepková, I. 2012. Market Power in the Czech Banking Sector. J. Competitiveness, 4(1): 143-155.
14. Sadeghi, K., Khodaverdizadeh, S. and Khodaverdizadeh, M. 2011. Comparative Advantage and World Market Structure of Saffron. J. Agr. Econ. Res., 3(3): 59-76.
15. Sneath, P. H. and Sokal, R. R. 1973. Numerical Taxonomy. The Principles and Practice of Numerical Classification.
16. Sneath, P. H. A. and Sokal, R. R. 1973. Principles of Numerical Taxonomy. In:" Numerical Taxonomy" San Francisco, W. H. Freeman and Company, USA.
17. UNCTAD. 2012. The State of Commodity Dependence. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, http://unctadxiii.org/en/SessionDocument/suc2011d8_en.pdf
18. Vollrath, T. L. 1989. Competitiveness and Protection in World Agriculture. In: "Agriculture Information Bulletin" Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service, USA.
19. Wei, H. and Chunming, Z. 2012. The Comparative Advantage of Chinese Manufactured Exports. Journal of Chinese Economic and Foreign Trade Studies, 5(2): 107 -126.
20. Williams, E. and Rosen, R. A. 1999. A Better Approach to Market Power Analysis. Technical Report, Tellus Institute, USA.
Journal of Agricultural Science and Technology
Volume 16, Issue 2
March and April 2014
Pages 253-264