Effects of Declining Energy Subsidies on Value Added in Agricultural Sector

Authors
Department of Agricultural Economics, Faculty of Agriculture, Tarbiat Modares University, Tehran, Islamic Republic of Iran.
Abstract
Production subsidies, as a part of the strategy of economic growth of the agricultural sector, are of great importance around the world. Subsidizing production inputs, particularly energy input, is another way of directing subsidy to the agricultural sector. In this research, production function of the agricultural sector was estimated using econometric methods and time series data. After calculating the elasticity of agricultural sector inputs and, simultaneously, estimating their cost and demand functions of production inputs using ISUR (Iterated Simingly Unrelated Regression), farmers' elasticity of price fluctuation of these inputs was determined. The findings of the production function demonstrated that all inputs, including capital, labor, and energy were used in the optimal production region. The findings of the cost function demonstrated that there was negative and low own elasticity price for inputs, in accord with economic theory. In addition, cross price elasticity of all inputs was positive, i.e. they were substitutes for each other. The findings of the subsidization policy showed that since price elasticity of demand for energy inputs was inelastic, reducing the energy subsidy would reduce energy consumption slightly and, eventually, would decrease value added in the agricultural sector. Finally, it is suggested that the government implements the energy subsidy reduction policy based on cost-benefit analysis.

Keywords


1. Aravindhakshan, S. C. and Koo, W. W. 2011. Energy, Agriculture, and GHG Emissions: The Role of Agriculture in Alternative Energy Production and GHG Emission Reduction in North Dakota. Report, 677, North Dakota State University.
2. Amir Teymori, S. and Khalilian, S. 2008. Survey of Factors Affecting Capital Stock Productivity of Iran’s Agricultural Sector. Agri. Econ. Dev., 61: 57–77. (in Persian)
3. Azizi, K. 2005. Impact of Removal of Subsidy from Fertilizer and Pesticides on Production of Rice in Gilan. Agri. Econ. Dev., 50: 95–123. (in Persian).
4. Banerjee, A., Dolado, J. J. and Mestre, R. 1992. On Some Simple Tests for Co-integration. The Cost of Simplicity, Mimeo, Institute of Economics, Aarhus, Banco de Spana, Denmark, pp. 267–283.
5. Barten, A. P. 1969. Maximum Likelihood Estimation of a Complete System of Demand Equations. Europ. Econ. Rev., 1: 7–73.
6. Becker, J. 2010. Energy Substitution in Agriculture: A Translog Cost Analysis of the US Agricultural Sector, 1992–2007. Thesis, MS. Degree in Arts in the General Economics Program, Youngstown State University.
7. Carr, B. 1992. The Economics of Agricultural Policy. CRS (Congressional Research Service) Report for Congress, Library of Congress, February 20, Washington, D.C, 92–198.
8. Christensen, L. R., Jorgenson, D. W. and Law, L. J. 1973. Transcendental Logarithmic Production Frontiers. Rev. Econ. Statist., 55: 28-45.
9. Debra, K. 2002. Agricultural Subsidies in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Reflection. IFDC Africa Division APIA Workshop, December 5-6 Lome.
10. Economic Time Series Database, The Central Bank of the Islamic Republic of Iran 1974-2008, http://tsd.cbi.ir, Retrieved 2011.
11. Fallahi, E. and Khalilian, S. 2009. Study and Comparison of the Importance of Oil Products and Electricity with Other Production Factors in Iran, Agricultural Sector. Agr. Econ. Res., 1(2): 1–19.
12. Greene, W. H. 2003. Econometric Analysis (Solution Manual). Prentice Hall, New Jersey, 152 PP.
13. Hozhabr Kiani, K. and Varedi, S. 2000. Coefficient of the Importance of Energy in Iran Agricultural Sector Production. Agri. Econ. Dev., 30: 7-41. (in Persian)
14. Iran Energy Balance Sheet, published by Iran's Energy Ministry, Secretariat of Energy and Electricity, (2008, in Persian).
15. Lambert, D. K. and Gong, J. 2010. Dynamic Adjustment of US Agriculture to Energy Price Changes. J. Agr. Appl. Econ., 42(2): 289–301.
16. Ma, H., Oxley, L., Gibson, J. and Kim, B. 2008. China's Energy Economy: Technical Change, Factor Demand and Interfactor/interfuel Substitution. Energy Econ., 30(5): 2167–2183.
17. Lindert, P. H. 1989. Economic Influences on the History of Agricultural Policy. University of California. Agricultural History Center (Working Paper Series No. 68), Davis, CA.
18. Pesaran, M. H. and Pesaran, B. 1977. Working With Microfit 4.0: An Interactive Introduction to Econometrics. Oxford University Press, pp.205.
19. Salami, H., Sadat Barikani, H. and Noori Naeini, M. S. 2012. Can Agriculture Be Considered a Key Sector for Economic Development in an Oil Producing Country? The Case of Iran. J. Agr. Sci. Tech., 14: 1–10.
20. Shemshadi, K. 2007. The Effect of the Government’s Subsidizing Policy on Wheat Production. MSc. Dissertation in Agricultural Economics, Tarbiat Modares University. (in Persian)
21. Shepherd, R. W. 1970. Theory of Cost and Production Functions. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, pp.308.
22. Siddiki, J. U. 2000. Demand for Money in Bangladesh: A Co-integration Analysis. Appl. Econ., 32: 1997–1984.
23. Thompson, C. D. 1988. Choice of Flexible Functional Forms: Review and Appraisal. Western J. Agr. Econ., 13: 169–183.
24. Soltani, G. 2005. Determination of Investment Return Rate in the Agricultural Sector. Agri. Econ. Dev., 45: 19–40. (in Persian).
25. Statistical Center of the Islamic Republic Iran.(SCI), http://www.amar.org.ir/.
26. Torkamani, J. 1998. Determination of Risk Aversion, Technical Efficiency and Effective Factors on it, a Case Study in Fars Province. Agri. Econ. Dev., 24: 49-68. (in Persian)
27. Zellner, A. 1962. An Efficient Method of Estimating Seemingly Unrelated Regression Equations and Tests of Aggregation Bias. JASA, 57: 500–509.
28. Zibayi, M. and Najafi, B. 1994. Economic Freedom and the Outcome of Changes in Relative Price Production in the Agricultural Sector. J. Agric. Econ. Devel. Special Seminar on Liberalization and Agricultural Development, 72pp. (in Persian).